2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding of website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
122
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
122
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical work has found that the presence of contact details, social networking and other communication features in websites positively influence trust and purchase intention (Lee and Kozar, 2012). Reflecting perhaps the value of this dimension, previous studies have analysed several communication features on SME websites, specifically those related with the enterprise contacts and with conventional forms of communication (García-Borbolla et al, 2005;Soto-Acosta and Meroño-Cerdan, 2006;Sun et al, 2012).…”
Section: Website Content and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirical work has found that the presence of contact details, social networking and other communication features in websites positively influence trust and purchase intention (Lee and Kozar, 2012). Reflecting perhaps the value of this dimension, previous studies have analysed several communication features on SME websites, specifically those related with the enterprise contacts and with conventional forms of communication (García-Borbolla et al, 2005;Soto-Acosta and Meroño-Cerdan, 2006;Sun et al, 2012).…”
Section: Website Content and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors evaluate detailed website features such as content (e.g., Ting et al, 2013), accessibility (e.g., Hanson and Richards, 2013) and usability (e.g., Lee and Kozar, 2012). Other authors focus on evaluating websites from the user (e.g., Luo et al, 2012) and a quality (e.g., Rocha, 2012) perspective.…”
Section: Website Evaluation Of Smementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of researchers paid attention to the quality assessment of website (Aladwani, 2006;Collier & Bienstock, 2015;Cuddihy & Spyridakis, 2012;Dholakia & Zhao, 2009;Guseva, 2010;Hasan & Abuelrub, 2011;Lee & Kozar, 2012;Rocha, 2012;Saremi, Abedin, & Kermani, 2008;Shejul & Padmavathi, 2015;Subramanian, Gunasekaran, & Yu, 2014;Wang, Yeh, & Yen, 2015;Zhang & Dran, 2000), customer behavior (Alzola & Robaina, 2010;Bressolles & Durrieu, 2010;Dennis, Merrilees, Jayawardhena, & Wright, 2009;Hamid & McGrath, 2015;Hodkinson, Kiel, & McColl-Kennedy, 2000;Yue & Chaturvedi, 2000;Maditinos & Theodoridis, 2010;Rahim, 2014;Su, Li, Song, & Chen, 2008), marketing communication tools such as: research in the area of web advertising efficiency (Moore, Stammerjohan, & Coulter, 2005;Richardson, Ganz, & Vallone, 2014), social media usage in different communication models (Agnihotri, Dingus, Hu, & Krush, 2015;Chan & Guillet, 2011;E Constantinides, 2015;de Vries, Gensler, & Leeflang, 2012;Jarvinen, Tollinen, Karjaluoti, & Jayawardhena, 2012;Kärkkäinen, Jussila, & Väisänen, 2010;Laroche, Habibi, & Richard, 2013;Michaelidou, 2011;Pabedinskaitė & Davidavičius, 2012;Riemer & Richter, 2010). It is important that social media us...…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis found that varying thumb sizes have significant effects on the satisfaction of text messaging users (2008). Lee, Kozar (2012). investigated the common dimensions of website usability by considering previous studies on the subject and then analyzing focus groups of web usability experts…”
Section: Research Related To Usability and Mobile Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%