Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial

Abstract

Objective This study explored consumers' perspectives on self‐monitoring, a common feature in behavioral interventions that helps inform consumers' progress and answer their questions, to learn what outcome metrics matter to consumers and whether self‐selection of these metrics leads to greater engagement (i.e., compliance, satisfaction) in self‐monitoring than monitoring only default options. Methods In a proof‐of‐concept randomized trial, 48 adult participants were randomly assigned to “clinician‐determined monitoring” or “clinician + self‐determined monitoring” conditions. Before starting monitoring, all participants shared outcomes that would matter to them in a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management. Then, for 3 weeks, participants in the “clinician‐determined” condition monitored their weight and binge‐eating episodes, and participants in the “clinician + self‐determined” condition monitored these and another metric of their choosing. After, satisfaction and compliance were assessed. Results Participants identified 116 metrics, grouped into 12 themes, that mattered to them. During monitoring, participants in the “clinician + self‐determined” condition monitored 41 metrics. Surprisingly, participants in the “clinician‐determined” condition also monitored metrics besides weight and binge eating. This resulted in a failure of our experimental manipulation, which represents a significant limitation of this research. No significant differences emerged in satisfaction or compliance between conditions. Discussion Although our proof‐of‐concept trial yielded null quantitative results, findings also suggested binge eating and weight management interventions may benefit from including an individually customizable monitoring option in addition to default metrics, warranting testing in future research. Public Significance Examining consumers' self‐monitoring preferences for a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management revealed a variety of metrics that matter to consumers, although binge eating and weight were still most valued. Findings from our proof‐of‐concept trial suggest design implications of encouraging an individually customizable monitoring option, in addition to default metrics, which needs to be tested in future research over a longer period and during actual mobile intervention delivery.

Weight Loss Expectations of Adults With Binge Eating: Cross-sectional Study With a Human-Centered Design Approach

“…Interested individuals responded to a web-based advertisement in dscout for a study to "understand self-tracking behaviors in mobile interventions for weight management and binge eating" [27]. After providing web-based informed consent, participants completed a brief web-based screener comprising questions developed by the study team to assess eligibility, including whether these individuals would be "be willing to use an app to help you lose weight and manage your binge eating."…”

Eating Disorders: Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis and Management

“…For more severe forms, when patients' symptoms do not improve with home treatment or their physical status is unstable (weight loss, BMI less than 14 kg/m2, low pulse, blood pressure, body temperature decreasing or fever present, difficulty performing the basic test of physical strength), more restrictive measures, such as partial or day admission, or even compulsory treatment, may be required. Anorexic patients do not want to die in general, but it is necessary to understand the psychological drive of an anorexic patient who is terrified of gaining weight, who is unable to rationally see that their physical condition has become critical, and that if the weight continues to drop, the result will be death (Busetto et al, 2022;Guo et al, 2022;J. Liu et al, 2022).…”