2021
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the peak growing season ecosystem water‐use efficiency at four boreal fens in the Athabasca oil sands region

Abstract: Ecosystem water-use efficiency (WUE), a ratio between gross ecosystem production (GEP) and water loss through evapotranspiration (ET) can be helpful for the assessment of coupled peatland carbon and water cycles under anthropogenic changes in the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR) where extensive oil sands development has been occurring since the 1960's. As such, this study assessed multiyear peak growing season variability of WUE at four fens (poor treed, poor open, treed moderate-rich, open saline) near Fort … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our understanding of the carbon and water cycle consequences of land cover change and land management have been shaped by the paired tower approach to quantify impacts of forest management (Desai et al, 2005; Goulden et al, 2006; Starr et al, 2016), ecological restoration (Hemes et al, 2019), ecological disturbances (Amiro, 2001; Kowalski et al, 2004; Rebane et al, 2019), agricultural management (Baker and Griffis, 2005; Chi et al, 2016; French et al, 2020; Moore et al, 2020; Runkle et al, 2018), and more. Our understanding of how ecosystem carbon and water cycles interact to determine the ecosystem water use efficiency has therefore also been shaped by paired tower studies (Anapalli et al, 2019; Stoy et al, 2008; Volik et al, 2021) and observations over multiple years have been used to quantify interactions between the carbon and water cycles across multiple scales in time (Novick et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our understanding of the carbon and water cycle consequences of land cover change and land management have been shaped by the paired tower approach to quantify impacts of forest management (Desai et al, 2005; Goulden et al, 2006; Starr et al, 2016), ecological restoration (Hemes et al, 2019), ecological disturbances (Amiro, 2001; Kowalski et al, 2004; Rebane et al, 2019), agricultural management (Baker and Griffis, 2005; Chi et al, 2016; French et al, 2020; Moore et al, 2020; Runkle et al, 2018), and more. Our understanding of how ecosystem carbon and water cycles interact to determine the ecosystem water use efficiency has therefore also been shaped by paired tower studies (Anapalli et al, 2019; Stoy et al, 2008; Volik et al, 2021) and observations over multiple years have been used to quantify interactions between the carbon and water cycles across multiple scales in time (Novick et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecosystem WUE is generally estimated as the ratio of gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE), or gross primary productivity (GPP) to evapotranspiration (ET) ( Hu et al., 2008 ; Guerrieri et al., 2016 ; Medlyn et al., 2017 ). GEP/ET is the most commonly used metric of ecosystem WUE ( Beer et al., 2009 ; Niu et al., 2011 ; Bai et al., 2020 ; Volik et al., 2021 ). Ecosystem WUE is driven by the trade-off between GEP and ET, and thus biotic and climatic factors that affect C assimilation or water loss or both could cause changes in WUE ( Leonardi et al., 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%