Unequal Voices: ‘Strategic’ Consultation in South Australia

Abstract

In 2006, the South Australian government undertook the largest consultation ever to take place in the state. Over 1600 South Australians were involved with the consultation on the revision of South Australia's Strategic Plan (SASP). This ‘big‐picture’ consultation was a significant attempt to connect with, and gain feedback from, the South Australian ‘community’ on the Rann government's vision for the state. This article is the first formal evaluation of the 2006 consultation on the SASP. To critically evaluate the consultation process, this article uses Pratchett's framework which examines participative processes through the two principles of responsiveness and representativeness. The article concludes that the state government's rhetoric about the success of the consultation obscures a number of deficiencies and tensions that underpinned the consultation process. This critique of the South Australian consultation provides some key insights for the current trend for strategic planning at the state level in Australia.

Can Government Communication Facilitate Policy Understanding Toward Energy Conservation? Evidence from an Old Industrial Base in China

“…Regarding prior consultation, the public consultation literature [40][41][42][43], as well as the debates in the field of more "evidence-informed" policy making [25,44], indicate that prior consultation should focus on collecting early information on the target group's status-quo on the policy issue and its willingness and potential difficulties to implement the policy. Hence, in the questionnaire we use three questions dealing with the frequency of information collection on the status-quo of the policy issue, the willingness and the potential difficulties to implement the policy to examine the level of prior consultation.…”

Public engagement and climate adaptation: insights from three local governments in Australia

“…However, as illustrated by the case studies, the mandated character of participation does not necessarily translate to stronger forms of public participation. In fact, often statutory participation results in top-down (Keen, Mercer, and Woodfull 1994;Lahiri-Dutt 2004;Brackertz and Meredyth 2009;Manwaring 2010) and tokenistic approaches (Mercer and Jotkowitz 2000;Osborne, Bacchi, and Mackenzie 2008;Manwaring 2010) that are mostly representative of the 'placation' stage of Arnstein's participation ladder (Hindmarsh and Matthews 2008). This top-down and tokenistic character of public participation is further compounded when Empowerment is also impeded by current legislation (for example, the Local Government Act 1989 [VIC]).…”

Consultation, Participation and Policy‐Making: Evaluating Australia's Renewable Energy Target

“…Including clear objectives of consultation will assist stakeholders to tailor their contribution to the consultation process, reducing the potential for negative externalities, whilst also enabling them to adjust their expectations of the outcomes of the consultation process. For instance, Manwaring () indicates that where participants in a consultation process were made aware that no radical changes to government objectives would result from a participation process, participants were aware that ‘pragmatic’ or ‘measurable’ demands were more likely to be given consideration. In this case, ‘participants were aware of the extent of their influence’, presenting them with an opportunity to focus their efforts on areas of consultation likely to result in changes to policy and practice.…”