2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5dt00360a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unexpected DNA binding properties with correlated downstream biological applications in mono vs. bis-1,8-naphthalimide Ru(ii)-polypyridyl conjugates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
45
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, T m of CT‐DNA is found to be 85.97 °C in the buffer; after addition of the Pd(II) complexes, T m of the DNA increases to 88 and 88.5 °C for complexes 1 and 2 , respectively. The results show the possibility of partial intercalation between the CT‐DNA and the two complexes …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, T m of CT‐DNA is found to be 85.97 °C in the buffer; after addition of the Pd(II) complexes, T m of the DNA increases to 88 and 88.5 °C for complexes 1 and 2 , respectively. The results show the possibility of partial intercalation between the CT‐DNA and the two complexes …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An increase in absorbance at 260 nm is attributed to intercalation of small molecules to ds‐DNA. Nevertheless, the slight shift in the T m value of CT‐DNA in the presence of complexes suggests non‐classical modes such as partial intercalation, groove binding and/or surface binding modes . The melting curves of CT‐DNA in the absence and presence of the complexes are presented in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ryan and coworkers have reported DNA binding behavior of mono and bis‐1,8‐naphthalimide Ru(II)‐polypyridyl conjugates ( 122 and 123 ; Figure ) by monitoring the absorption bands of naphthalimide and Ru(II) center . The observed 37 % hypochromism of the 1,8‐naphthalimide band of compound 122 in the presence increased concentration of st‐DNA suggested the possibility of intercalation with DNA (Table ).…”
Section: Metal Complexesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, eliminating a specific biological target, DNA, found predominantly in cancer cells, is the approach in use. Though various mechanisms can be found for damaging DNA, tailoring a metal complex that fits all the above and possesses the ability to interact and manipulate vital aspects in cell proliferation is an added advantage, in fact the best strategy to date . Then again, the hydrophobic nature of synthetic complexes in the normal biological medium, water, is one of the major experimental drawbacks in bioinorganic studies and can be remedied with the introduction of new functional groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%