2009
DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e31818e0e02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unexpected Slight Fluorodeoxyglucose-Uptake on Positron Emission Tomography in a Pulmonary Hamartoma

Abstract: We report the case of a patient with suspected hamartoma with slight fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET). Initially, follow-up with repeat computed tomography (CT) scan was proposed. Because of the risk for retro-obstructive pneumonia, and because there was a small increase in diameter of the lesion on CT, thoracotomy was proposed. Pathologic examination revealed a surprising and rare finding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it was impossible to identify numerous vessels in the mass. Moreover, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is useful for the differentiation of pulmonary mass lesions [20]. However, some reports on hamartomas describe the difficulty with differentiation from malignant tumors when a slight abnormal accumulation of FDG is recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it was impossible to identify numerous vessels in the mass. Moreover, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is useful for the differentiation of pulmonary mass lesions [20]. However, some reports on hamartomas describe the difficulty with differentiation from malignant tumors when a slight abnormal accumulation of FDG is recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these lesions showed FDG uptake, therefore none was considered typically benign, and we proceeded to surgical resection in all cases. For the lesions with a lower uptake, a diagnosis of hamartoma was considered unlikely, because the FDG uptake is exceptional for hamartomas [21,22]; infections or inflammatory lesions remained in the differential diagnosis but they were considered less probable than carcinoids after a careful examination of the patient. Regarding the lesions with a higher uptake, a diagnosis of lung carcinoma, particularly a low-grade adenocarcinoma, was taken into account; in these latter cases, a further unconfirmed suspicion of carcinoid would not have affected the adequacy of the surgical indication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, because there was no abnormal accumulation of FDG, we were able to judge the lesion to very likely be a benign tumor. However, some reports on hamartomas describe difficulty with differentiation from malignant tumors when slight abnormal accumulation of FDG is recognized [10]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%