2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified cutting force model for turning, boring, drilling and milling operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
75
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various inserted tool tip geometries are used in the cutting tools, and seventeen inserted tool tip shapes are defined in ISO 13399 standards (Kaymakci et al 2012). The generalized geometric model of the inserted tools is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kinematic Motion Of Cutting Edgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are various inserted tool tip geometries are used in the cutting tools, and seventeen inserted tool tip shapes are defined in ISO 13399 standards (Kaymakci et al 2012). The generalized geometric model of the inserted tools is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kinematic Motion Of Cutting Edgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of the tool tips are defined in their local coordinate system O T analytically. The control points are derived as functions of insert parameters that have been adapted from Kaymakci et al (2012). …”
Section: Kinematic Motion Of Cutting Edgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oblique transformation method is most useful when modeling solid tools with continuously varying edge and chip geometry [10]. A unified geometric, kinematic, and mechanic model was proposed which allows the prediction of chatter stability for multiple machining operations with defined cutting edges by Altintas et al [11,12]. A novel dynamic cutting force model is proposed by Li et al [13], in which the cutting mechanism and the cutting force contribution on both the peripheral and the front cutting edges are taken into consideration simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that, in the above studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], dynamic cutting forces are only the function of dynamic chip thickness, and cutting force versus unit of dynamic chip thickness must be unique. However as shown in Figure 1, cutting forces versus the same dynamic chip thickness (Δℎ 1 = Δℎ 2 ) are unequal at different nominal chip thickness (Δ 1 ̸ = Δ 2 ), due to the fact that the nominal chip thickness is neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%