1997
DOI: 10.1214/ss/1030037904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cred i bil ity inter val rep re sents the range inwhichtheORfallswithaprob a bil ityof90%.Wecallp the pos te rior prob a bil ity for the effect to be larger/smaller than 1 (when the pos te rior mean was larger/smaller than 1). In other words, p shows how much of the pos te rior dis tri bu tion of the over all effectliesaboveorbelow1:avalueofp close to 1 refers to a reli able esti mate (for more infor ma tion on the Bayes ian p, see Berger et al 1997;Casella and Berger 1987).…”
Section: Pairwise Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cred i bil ity inter val rep re sents the range inwhichtheORfallswithaprob a bil ityof90%.Wecallp the pos te rior prob a bil ity for the effect to be larger/smaller than 1 (when the pos te rior mean was larger/smaller than 1). In other words, p shows how much of the pos te rior dis tri bu tion of the over all effectliesaboveorbelow1:avalueofp close to 1 refers to a reli able esti mate (for more infor ma tion on the Bayes ian p, see Berger et al 1997;Casella and Berger 1987).…”
Section: Pairwise Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 displays a scatter plot matrix of − log 10 (p), where p either corresponds to the Model I through IV unadjusted p-value for tests of DE or to the Model V posterior probability for non-DE for mutants ceg1-250 (panel (a)) and spt4∆ (panel (b)). Note that by relating Model I through IV results to Model V results we may seemingly be perpetuating the "severe pedagogical problem of misinterpreting p-values as posterior probabilities"(Berger et al (1997)). However, this is not the case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributional assumptions for observations or unknown quantities can be included at will. Furthermore, it is well known that Bayesian model estimates and decisions can maintain frequentist properties, such as unbiasedness, interval coverage, and error rates (Box, 1980;Woodroofe, 1976;Diaconis & Freedman, 1986;Little, 2006;Severini, 1993;Thatcher, 1964;Nicolaou, 1993;Berger et al, 1997;Peers, 1968). Importantly, regardless of assumptions, the inferential procedure remains the same in that inferences are drawn from the posterior distribution instead of a hypothetical sampling distribution.…”
Section: Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%