2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm04115g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform hollow mesoporous silica nanocages for drug delivery in vitro and in vivo for liver cancer therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the MTT results, MSNs without EPI showed negligible cytotoxicity because of their biocompatibility and low concentration of MSNs which was used for drug delivery (under 40 µg /mL) and it consistent with former studies (Data not shown) [40,55]. The results of MTT were compatible with the in vitro EPI release and the flow cytometry analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to the MTT results, MSNs without EPI showed negligible cytotoxicity because of their biocompatibility and low concentration of MSNs which was used for drug delivery (under 40 µg /mL) and it consistent with former studies (Data not shown) [40,55]. The results of MTT were compatible with the in vitro EPI release and the flow cytometry analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In order to minimize undesired damages of healthy cells without reducing therapeutic action of Dox, drug carrier systems are widely used (Aznar et al, 2011;Bernardos et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2013;Gao et al, 2011;Gu et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2013;Knezevic et al, 2011Knezevic et al, , 2013Lee et al, 2010Lee et al, , 2011Maeda et al, 2003;Meng et al, 2010;Mishra et al, 2014;Nishiyama and Kataoka, 2003;Prokopowicz and Przyjazny, 2007;Prokopowicz et al, 2016;Safari and Zarnegar, 2014;Singh et al, 2011;Tan et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2008;Yokoyama, 2011;Yuan et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011). Among them, ordered mesoporous silicas of MCM-41 type are the most promising solid supports for the formation of biologically active systems (Aznar et al, 2011;Bernardos et al, 2010;Gu et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2013;Knezevic et al, 2011Knezevic et al, , 2013Lee et al, 2010Lee et al, , 2011Meng et al, 2010;Prokopowicz et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pH 7.4 (curve b), approximately 35 % of the DOX was released within 5 h and it remained unchanged during about 10 h. While at pH 5.3 (curve a), a more acidic internal microenvironment in cancer cells, 82 % of the loaded DOX was released in the same time. This trend isattributed to the increased hydrophilicity and higher solubility of DOX in lower pH caused by increased protonated -NH 2 groups on DOX[46]. These results imply that the Eu 3+ -doped Gd 2 O 3 HMNPs drug delivery system has a strongly pH-dependent drug release of DOX.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%