2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a lack of difference in explicit instructional delivery is predicted by GenSLA, the results provide support for form-focused teaching. Finally, for teacher training programs, the study reinforces the view in Whong et al (2013) that instructional design and assessment need to be informed by fine-grained linguistic analysis. It further underscores the need for language teacher preparation programs to provide enhanced training in the linguistics of the target language and theories of language representation and acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…While a lack of difference in explicit instructional delivery is predicted by GenSLA, the results provide support for form-focused teaching. Finally, for teacher training programs, the study reinforces the view in Whong et al (2013) that instructional design and assessment need to be informed by fine-grained linguistic analysis. It further underscores the need for language teacher preparation programs to provide enhanced training in the linguistics of the target language and theories of language representation and acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This, we believe, gets to the heart of the problem and suggests why something like Pedagogical Linguistics can contribute to part of a solution. Generative theory, just like any theory of language acquisition, can surely deliver insights relevant for teaching and learning (see papers in Whong et al, 2013 on generative theory; Littlemore, 2009 on an alternative formal approach in terms of cognitive/construction grammar; and the recent collection of papers in Trotzke & Kupisch, 2020). But, as illustrated in the volumes just cited, discussion of application and pedagogical relevance often remains within particular research communities.…”
Section: Why Pedagogical Linguistics?mentioning
confidence: 99%