2017
DOI: 10.16950/iujad.337132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Çevre Duyarlılıkları Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Örneği

Abstract: In this study, university students' opinions and expectations of environmental issues are evaluated in accordance with the foresight of that especially individuals with environmental awareness be effective on protection and conservation of the environment where they live in. For this purpose; environmental sensitivity of students from various faculties of Namik Kemal University were investigated. The method of the study was formed based on survey, observation and literature. The number of participants which we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some studies analyzed the attitudes of students and teacher candidates and environmental biocentrism, ecocentrism, anthropocentricism, and techno-centric approaches while performing research domestically and abroad (Erten, 2007;Erten, 2008;Saka, Sürmeli, & Öztuna, 2009;Karakaya, 2009;Erten & Aydoğdu, 2011;Çobanoğlu, Karakaya, & Türer, 2012;Karakaya & Çobanoğlu, 2012;Sürmeli & Saka, 2013;Cappellaro, 2016;Thompson & Barton, 1994;Thompson, 1998;Schultz & Zelezny, 1999;Kortenkamp & Moore, 2001;Casey & Scott, 2006;Özdemir, 2014;Kasalak, Yurcu, & Akıncı, 2018;Bozdemir & Faiz, 2018). In addition to those studies, students' awareness and perceptions about environmental ethics (Özdemir, 2012;Bülbül, 2013;Özer, 2015;Gerçek, 2016;Sungur, 2017;Dikicigil, 2018) and their environmental sensitivities (Kiper, Korkut, & Topal, 2017) have also been explored in some works. Other works in the literature have addressed students' values in relation to the nature of their orientation, the nature of their choices of study (Dervişoğlu & Kılıç, 2013), patterns of moral reasoning on environmental issues among socio-scientific program students (Uzel, 2014), the necessity of bioethics education (Bakar, 2010), attitudes towards environmental ethics and sustainable environment (Tunç & Yenice, 2017), and knowledge of environmental ethics (Wongchantra & Nuangchalerm, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies analyzed the attitudes of students and teacher candidates and environmental biocentrism, ecocentrism, anthropocentricism, and techno-centric approaches while performing research domestically and abroad (Erten, 2007;Erten, 2008;Saka, Sürmeli, & Öztuna, 2009;Karakaya, 2009;Erten & Aydoğdu, 2011;Çobanoğlu, Karakaya, & Türer, 2012;Karakaya & Çobanoğlu, 2012;Sürmeli & Saka, 2013;Cappellaro, 2016;Thompson & Barton, 1994;Thompson, 1998;Schultz & Zelezny, 1999;Kortenkamp & Moore, 2001;Casey & Scott, 2006;Özdemir, 2014;Kasalak, Yurcu, & Akıncı, 2018;Bozdemir & Faiz, 2018). In addition to those studies, students' awareness and perceptions about environmental ethics (Özdemir, 2012;Bülbül, 2013;Özer, 2015;Gerçek, 2016;Sungur, 2017;Dikicigil, 2018) and their environmental sensitivities (Kiper, Korkut, & Topal, 2017) have also been explored in some works. Other works in the literature have addressed students' values in relation to the nature of their orientation, the nature of their choices of study (Dervişoğlu & Kılıç, 2013), patterns of moral reasoning on environmental issues among socio-scientific program students (Uzel, 2014), the necessity of bioethics education (Bakar, 2010), attitudes towards environmental ethics and sustainable environment (Tunç & Yenice, 2017), and knowledge of environmental ethics (Wongchantra & Nuangchalerm, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%