University business models in disequilibrium – engaging industry and end users within university technology transfer processes

Abstract

This article explores how greater engagement with industry and end users has influenced the University Technology Transfer Business Model. In order to achieve this, they adopted a qualitative methodology which draws upon case study evidence of two case universities located in a particular region. The findings, represented in a conceptual framework depict a hybrid University Technology Transfer Business Model which is in a state of permanent disequilibrium as a result of path dependency and organisational culture. This permanent disequilibrium was found to cause challenges in relation to scarce resource allocation and also impacted upon the willingness and ability of academics to engage with industry and end users throughout the technology transfer process. This article contributes to an emerging stream of research on hybrid business models by identifying the challenges of permanent disequilibrium where multiple and conflicting stakeholder goals compete for legitimacy and scarce resources. From a policy and practitioner viewpoint, this research draws attention to the complexities of university, government, industry and end user (Quadruple Helix stakeholders) engagement and the implications of such on university strategy where conflicting dominant logics can cause challenges with alignment of organisational processes and mechanisms.

The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges

“…Adopting an internationalization orientation, entrepreneurial universities are more proactive in terms of attracting and retaining talent with entrepreneurial mindsets and behaviours; capturing balanced and diversified funds for ensuring long-term investment in entrepreneurial and innovative activities; and building strategic partnerships with key agents with a strong entrepreneurial innovation presence and recognition across the globe. Third, are internal factors relating to a diversified strategic orientation (McAdam et al 2017;Abdelkafi et al 2018;Madichie and Gbadamosi, 2017). By adopting a diversified strategic orientation, entrepreneurial universities looking for the achievement of multiple stakeholders' goals and long-term survival by focusing on value creation and hybrid business models in the delivery and support of entrepreneurial and innovative initiatives.…”

In search of lost time: the temporal construction of innovation management

“…The findings were interpreted in terms of the transition of a business model from a ‘triple helix’ to a ‘quadruple helix’ model (Carayannis and Rakhmatullin, 2014). The authors report that: ‘at the end of the research period, it was evident that both universities were in a state of disequilibrium and had slowly transitioned their [business model] to a point where they were exhibiting a hybrid [model] where they were exhibiting elements of both a [triple‐helix based model] and a [quadruple helix based model] simultaneously’ (McAdam et al, 2017, p. 468). In other words, change in the innovation business model is explained as incremental adaptive incorporation of new practices (i.e., novelty) between two equilibrium states (i.e., stability).…”

Human Capital as a Basis for the Development of a Modern University

“…Article [3] offers a new approach to the conceptualization of the human capital resource by developing a multilevel model. Also a number of works are aimed at studying the development of universities [4][5][6][7] where the engine of development is human capital [8][9][10].…”