2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-015-9952-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpacking Pandora’s Box: Understanding and Categorising Ecosystem Disservices for Environmental Management and Human Wellbeing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
230
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
230
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the absence of an accepted typology for ecosystem disservices (Shackleton et al 2016) and the difficulty of clarifying the meaning of the services identified in the study with the people involved, a future improvement on the current method would be to build such a typology in the context of rural communities in the Amazon.…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the absence of an accepted typology for ecosystem disservices (Shackleton et al 2016) and the difficulty of clarifying the meaning of the services identified in the study with the people involved, a future improvement on the current method would be to build such a typology in the context of rural communities in the Amazon.…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While an authoritative classification scheme for ecosystem services exists through the MEA [1], a similar classification of ecosystem disservices does not currently exist. In this study, broad categories were used that matched those identified by Shackleton et al [17] along a spectrum of ecosystem origin (biological versus abiotic) and primary dimension of human wellbeing affected (economic, physical health, and aesthetic/cultural), and are broadly similar to disservices previously identified for mangroves in Panama City by López-Angarita et al [19]. The three categories of darkness/gloominess, danger, and disease were tested through a pilot study of 20 documents.…”
Section: Sources Of Historical Information On Mangrove Ecosystem Servmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of ecosystem disservices discussed in these reports (59%) referred to the role of mangroves as a reservoir of disease; since these reports were written before the advent of germ theory in medicine, the main vector of disease was thought to be "miasma", poisonous vapors emitted from decaying matter [21]. Of the ecosystem disservices reported, 28% referred to the general view of mangrove forests as gloomy (or other similar words), suggesting a negative cultural and aesthetic response to the mangrove environment [17]. Ecosystem services were explicitly described in 41% of the reports, 73% of which referred to provisioning services, especially for timber and fuelwood.…”
Section: Sources Of Historical Information On Mangrove Ecosystem Servmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations