2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-013-0486-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady flow with separation behind a shock wave diffracting over curved walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This secondary vortex interaction is similar in nature to those reported for classical M s = 1.5 flow over 90 • diffraction corner, see e.g. (Sun and Takayama, 2003;Skews et al, 2012;Law et al, 2014;. The incident shock further gets diffracted in the right corner of the cavity and produces the reflected wave which rebounds back and forth in the cavity section and intensely perturbs the growing primary vortex and the shear layer.…”
Section: General Flow Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This secondary vortex interaction is similar in nature to those reported for classical M s = 1.5 flow over 90 • diffraction corner, see e.g. (Sun and Takayama, 2003;Skews et al, 2012;Law et al, 2014;. The incident shock further gets diffracted in the right corner of the cavity and produces the reflected wave which rebounds back and forth in the cavity section and intensely perturbs the growing primary vortex and the shear layer.…”
Section: General Flow Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, viscous interactions become significant for shock-boundary layer/boundary layer-shear layer interactions and for long term shock-vortex dynamics. For example, the classical shock diffraction over 90 • sharp corner requires the consideration of no-slip walls in numerical approach to predict the secondary vortex and long-time evolution of flow dynamics (Sun and Takayama, 2003;Skews et al, 2012;Law et al, 2014;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model looks promising than both the k-ω and k-ε turbulence models especially in the analysis of a separating flow that requires adequate resolution of near wall effect without introducing unnecessary viscous dissipation outside the boundary layer. It has been confirmed accurate and more reliable for adverse pressure gradient flows Law et al (2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Fomin [7] presented an interesting review of the evolution of the shock tube experimental facilities. Unsteady flow-separation behind a diffracting shock wave over curved walls and multi-faceted walls are presented in [8] and [9]. Experimental study of Quinn & Kontis [10] reported measurement of the static pressure for shock diffraction process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%