“…Moreover, the radiation dose is considerably smaller with 123 I-MIBG as compared to 131 I-MIBG (Kloos et al, 1998). Although false positive findings of MIBG scan have been considered rare, almost 20 false such cases have been reported, due to various reasons (Shapiro et al, 1985b;Kao et al, 1996;Bahar et al, 1988;Bathmann et al, 1994;Krubsack et al, 1988;Sone et al, 1996;Rainis et al, 2000;Horne et al, 1991;Cortes-Blanco et al, 2000;Jacobs et al, 1990;Hanson et al, 1991;Gallar et al, 1993;Fischer et al, 1984;Letizia et al, 1998;Ünal et al, 1995;Burt et al, 2002). Prolonged retention of isotope due to dilated renal pelvis or hydronephrosis was the reason in 4 cases Kao et al, 1996;Bahar et al, 1988;Bathmann et al, 1994) and abnormalities in the route excretion was also possibly the reason in the case of a renal failure (Gallar et al, 1993), a small ischemic kidney (Horne et al, 1991), a kidney with renal artery stenosis (Cortes-Blanco et al, 2000) and a focal pyelonephritis (Jacobs et al, 1990).…”