2012 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition (DATE) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/date.2012.6176705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UPaRC—Ultra-fast power-aware reconfiguration controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We point out that the frames read/write operations are the ones taking a great portion of the overall execution time of each strategy (the SysACE read/write can be performed by a dedicated controller) and that the speed of the HwIcap is a bottle neck for this method. For our system both configuration and readback can be minimized by using dedicated hardware controller such as UPaRC [24] or FaRM [25], which performs partial dynamic reconfiguration at high speed and takes into account the power consumption factor. The footprint of a checkpoint can be optimized by just saving the binary differences between the initial bitsream and the read back one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that the frames read/write operations are the ones taking a great portion of the overall execution time of each strategy (the SysACE read/write can be performed by a dedicated controller) and that the speed of the HwIcap is a bottle neck for this method. For our system both configuration and readback can be minimized by using dedicated hardware controller such as UPaRC [24] or FaRM [25], which performs partial dynamic reconfiguration at high speed and takes into account the power consumption factor. The footprint of a checkpoint can be optimized by just saving the binary differences between the initial bitsream and the read back one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While external reconfiguration controller outside the FPGA is needed for JTAG and SelectMAP, ICAP enables internal access within the FPGA, supporting self-reconfiguration approaches. Therefore, ICAP interface has been widely used together with soft-IP processor (Xilinx Micro Blaze) or hard-IP processor (IBM PowerPC), and many studies on new interface for ICAP have been performed to enhance reconfiguration speed [13,14] or reduce hardware resources required [15]. For Zynq SoC, additional interface, called Processor Configuration Access Port (PCAP), is provided to enable PS to configure PL region [16].…”
Section: Zynq Soc Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this technology, the operating system is able to schedule hardware threads [18], without resetting the rest of the system. For real-time applications, both readback and reconfiguration overheads must be minimized using a dedicated hardware reconfiguration controller, such as FaRM [19], Uparc [20] or the solution offered by Koch et al [21]. For instance, FaRM which is used in the design test detailed later allow to process configuration with a throughput of 400 MB/s.…”
Section: B Reconfiguration Servicementioning
confidence: 99%