Urban land planning: The role of a Master Plan in influencing local temperatures

Abstract

a b s t r a c tLand use planning (LUP) is central for managing issues related to climatic variation in urban environments. However, Master Plans (MPs) usually do not include climatic aspects, and few studies have addressed climate change at the urban scale, especially in developing countries. This paper proposes a framework with ten categories for assessment of climatic variation in urban LUP. Each category comprises attributes that describe a complex of relationships in influencing local temperature variations. They are analyzed for the case of the Master Plan of Porto Alegre (MPPA), the Southernmost metropolis of Brazil. It is concluded that the MPPA is strongly grounded in climate-related land and zoning coordination, but exhibits weaknesses in building, cartographical and social aspects considered synergistically relevant for tackling problems related to urban climate variation. Furthermore, the MPPA does not contain provisions related to monitoring of local climate and greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions and it is ineffective for improving energy efficiency. Specific MPPA failures stemming from these weaknesses include: an increase of 21.79% in the city's urbanized area from 1986 to 2011 to accommodate a similar increase in population, with significant horizontal sprawl; average temperature rise of 0.392°C from

The Seasonal and Diurnal Influence of Surrounding Land Use on Temperature: Findings from Seoul, South Korea

“…Another body of literature looks into how land use in cities affect local temperature [53][54][55][56][57][58], which may benefit local planning practice. However, many of these studies tend to oversimplify land use information; for example, Weng et al [58] classified local land use into three types that seem to be broad: commercial and industrial, residential, and green.…”

Flood induced vulnerability in strategic plan making process of Riyadh city

“…Thus, composite vulnerability score incorporating physical and social vulnerabilities has been effective in actual assessment of potential risks posed by floods and resulting damages. Use of composite score values as input-decisive variables in the master plan making process has been quite an established practice in North America, European Union and far eastern countries including China, South Korea, Japan, and Australia (Kim & Rowe, 2013;Viegas, Saldanha, Bond, Ribeiro, & Selig, 2013). Specifically, investment decision on city's infrastructure to make it resilient against the natural disasters including flood is largely influenced by the estimated vulnerability score of the city neighborhoods (Melgarejo & Lakes, 2014;Saraswati, 2014).…”

A Review of Urban Planning Research for Climate Change

“…The interaction between urban land use and climate change elements produces a synergistic effect; for example, land use patterns affect the relationship between various air pollution coordination functions, city water circulation and the heat environment, and the role of collaborative climate change and ecological effects [30,31]. Urban land use intensity and the effects of climate change will also impact biodiversity [32,33] in that urban sprawl and unsustainable land use change cause local climate changes [34].…”