SAE Technical Paper Series 2014
DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-2352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urea SCR System Development for Large Diesel Engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SCR operating costs comprise urea cost, maintenance cost, and catalyst replacement cost. The reducing agent in marine applications is 35-40% solution of urea in de-ionized water [53]. Urea dosing for target reduction ∆NO x (g/kWh) is given by multiplying the target by 0.652.…”
Section: Selective Catalytic Reduction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCR operating costs comprise urea cost, maintenance cost, and catalyst replacement cost. The reducing agent in marine applications is 35-40% solution of urea in de-ionized water [53]. Urea dosing for target reduction ∆NO x (g/kWh) is given by multiplying the target by 0.652.…”
Section: Selective Catalytic Reduction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modeling method was applied for analyzing NOx conversion efficiency impact aspects by considering the NH 3 storage capability in a DOC+DPF+SCR aftertreatment system [7]. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was used to optimize aftertreatment packaging design for better SCR performance and higher NOx conversion efficiency [8][9][10]. Ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) was considered as an aftertreatment to reduce NH 3 slip [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NO x conversion can be improved by increasing the NH 3 /NO x ratio, this is at the cost of unreacted ammonia exiting the converter, which is undesirable. Moreover, it is known that insufficient residence time or urea deposition on the walls of the mixing chamber can cause incomplete conversion of urea. , In the experimental studies reported by Yamauchi et al and Tamaldin et al, most of the urea droplets from the injection entered the SCR unconverted. Even in the case of complete urea conversion to ammonia, improper mixing within the chamber can lead to nonuniform ammonia concentration distribution across the cross section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%