Urgency of Online Petition to guarantee the Freedom of Speech and Participate Rights in Government

Abstract

The freedom to express ideas and participate in the government is often manifested through democratic voting or involvement in general elections, but the processes taking place in elections cannot fully ensure that the members of the public can get their rights to the freedom of speech and participation in the government. With doctrinal legal method, this research has found that there seems to be an urgency to initiate an online petition platform in Indonesia as an alternative channel accessible to all the members of the public in order to optimize the exercise of the freedom of speech and equal participation in the government. Online petition systems have been around in Indonesia for quite some time, initiated and managed by change.org as a private organization along with other non-governmental organizations, but the legal loophole regarding online petitions that represent public participation in forming policies has not been capable of guaranteeing the attention or responses from the government over particular issues. In order to gain more perspectives, this article compare the online petition systems in the US and South Korea that were initiated by presidential agencies, and also the online petition in Germany that is under the direct management of the Petition Committee bellow the parliament (Bundestag). Therefore, it is concluded that Indonesian president has the power to rule the government in order to respond the urgency to give protection and fulfill Human Rights, especially freedom of speech and the rights to participate in the government by setting the legal basis.

Waste management without direction in Indonesia: a proposed legal reform towards smart cities

“…The top-down approach involves explicitly assigning responsibilities to the Central Government and Local Governments. The bottom-up approach involves meaningful involvement of the community in shaping waste management policies that are beneficial for both the governments and the people (Arrsa et al, 2022;Kusumaningrum et al, n.d.;Listiningrum, 2019b;Listiningrum et al, 2022;Listiningrum & Bachtiar, 2018;Mahira et al, 2021). Governments create a balanced and accountable waste management ecosystem due to legal certainty (Listiningrum et al, 2021).…”

Can National Strategy Sidestep Civil and Political Rights? The Case of Indonesia’s Simultaneous Regional Elections

“…Civil and political rights are rights attached to every human being and protected by the state so that every person can participate in civil and political matters. An example of civil and political rights fulfilment in Indonesia is the general election (Arrsa et al, 2022). Furthermore, civil and political rights are categorised as negative rights.…”

Paradigm of Law and Human Rights as a Protection of Academic Freedom in Indonesia

“…(5). Public authorities must respect, protect, and ensure measures to guarantee academic freedom (Arrsa et al, 2022). These various kinds of national legal regulations serve as good guidelines for academics in tertiary institutions, for the State, and for all Indonesian people to respect, protect, and fulfill academic freedom as the basis of human rights law in Indonesia.…”