2016
DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2016.1160837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US military logistics outsourcing and the everywhere of war

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, in most developed market economies, the private military services industry has been on the rise due to the increasing commercialization and gradual privatization of state-owned enterprises engaged in the production, transportation, maintenance and management of weapons and military equipment, or the commercialization and privatization of organizations that previously performed a wider range of logistical functions within the military or the Ministry of Defense (Moore, 2017). The increase in the number of military outsourcing companies is explained by the effect of the post-Cold War restructuring of the armed forces in the late 20th century, which later expanded significantly by using private contractors to supply military services that concentrated and specialized the knowledge and capabilities of discharged defense personnel.…”
Section: The Impact Of Business Logistics On Military Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, in most developed market economies, the private military services industry has been on the rise due to the increasing commercialization and gradual privatization of state-owned enterprises engaged in the production, transportation, maintenance and management of weapons and military equipment, or the commercialization and privatization of organizations that previously performed a wider range of logistical functions within the military or the Ministry of Defense (Moore, 2017). The increase in the number of military outsourcing companies is explained by the effect of the post-Cold War restructuring of the armed forces in the late 20th century, which later expanded significantly by using private contractors to supply military services that concentrated and specialized the knowledge and capabilities of discharged defense personnel.…”
Section: The Impact Of Business Logistics On Military Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, challenging the mainstream construction of business logistics as a technical applied science, others have traced the roots of business logistics within the field of military logistics (Chung ), noting that the “military art of moving soldiers and supplies to the front” has become a “business science” that animates all aspects of war‐making (Cowen :4). Although forged in earlier military contexts, the US‐led War on Terror, increased the centrality of privatised logistics to modern warfare (Abrahamsen and Leander ; Moore ). Logistics corporations developed into significant components of military missions, often contracted to move supplies and take on feeding and housing troops.…”
Section: Deciphering Humanitarian Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al Futtaim, owned by a leading UAE domestic capital group, advertises its credential as “prime contractors to NATO forces in conflict zones” (Al‐Futtaim Logistics ). Dubai‐based logistics firms have also been key to the provision of logistical labour to the US military, with Moore (:11) noting that such firms “tapped recruiting brokers and agencies in countries like India, the Philippines, Nepal, and Sri Lanka to amass the pool of labourers needed to fulfil their [the US’] growing contractual obligations in Iraq”. This specialisation in the recruitment of logistical labour maps neatly onto the UAE's long‐established labour regime—a highly hierarchical, ethnoracial labour regime in which trade unions and public protests are banned…”
Section: The Commercial Military and Humanitarian Nexus Of The Uae mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the language of the real estate corporation, logistics contributes to “structuring the territory” (Cushman & Wakefield, ). It did so when it was conceived as a military function, as forces had to be moved, supplied and re‐organized across space and time (Moore, ; Yoho, Rietjens, & Tatham, ). And it did so, likewise, as a technology of imperialism, when logistics permitted the exploration and exploitation of foreign countries as colonies, for the purpose of resource extraction, supply of cheap labor, or in the context of geopolitical strategies (Williams , quoted after Cowen, , p. 8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%