2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a lure in visual census significantly improves probability of detecting wait-ambushing and fast cruising predatory fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a surface-based, nondestructive, underwater visual-census (VC) method enhanced with a simple 5 cm × 0.5 cm double-cone lead lure moved with a transparent monofilament line a few centimeters above the substratum. The lure has been shown to increase the probability of sampling fast-moving, cryptic, and motionless species [12,18,34]. VC offers important advantages over catch-based methods, including the potential to identify all species within their currently occupied habitats, to estimate the relative cover of each habitat in the sampled area, and to observe behavior of each fish visiting the lure, including predatory behavior targeting the lure.…”
Section: Sampling Fish and Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a surface-based, nondestructive, underwater visual-census (VC) method enhanced with a simple 5 cm × 0.5 cm double-cone lead lure moved with a transparent monofilament line a few centimeters above the substratum. The lure has been shown to increase the probability of sampling fast-moving, cryptic, and motionless species [12,18,34]. VC offers important advantages over catch-based methods, including the potential to identify all species within their currently occupied habitats, to estimate the relative cover of each habitat in the sampled area, and to observe behavior of each fish visiting the lure, including predatory behavior targeting the lure.…”
Section: Sampling Fish and Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speed was held constant for 10 seconds of travel but the transect length varied from 3 to 4.5 meters per second due to random variability in current. Each transect was defined by a straight line traversed by the lure and the sampling volume extended one meter to the right and left of the transect, from the snorkeler to the sea bottom [34].…”
Section: Transectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apex predators displayed lower values in density and biomass in all habitats. Fishing practices that target high trophic level species (Pauly et al, 1998;Macpherson, 2000), the shallow depth of the sampling (Tunesi et al, 2006) and the low detectability of apex predators during visual census (Kruschel & Schultz, 2011) could be considered responsible for the observed scarcity of their occurrence.…”
Section: Imberbis (A_imb) Coris Julis (C_jul) Diplodus Puntazzo (D_mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of recorded taxa (45) was somewhat higher than previously described in other Mediterranean areas (at similar depth and using visual census): 38 from the Balearic Islands (Frau et al, 2003), 37 from Alicante, Spain (Valle and Bayle-Sempere, 2009), 35 from the Ligurian Sea (Tunesi and Vacchi, 1993) and 34 from Otranto, Apulian coast (Guidetti, 2000). The higher number of recorded taxa is probably because the lureassisted visual census was used (Kruschel and Schultz, 2012). Visual counts facilitated by a device to lure out fish from their hideout into the view of the diver can significantly improve the probability of detecting small fish hidden within the seagrass canopy, predators that search for and encounter prey from a concealed position (e.g., ambush predators and wait-chase predators) or fast cruising predators which are easily overlooked during their brief appearance in regular transects (Kruschel and Schultz, 2012).…”
Section: The Fish Assemblage Of Posidonia Oceanica Meadowsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The higher number of recorded taxa is probably because the lureassisted visual census was used (Kruschel and Schultz, 2012). Visual counts facilitated by a device to lure out fish from their hideout into the view of the diver can significantly improve the probability of detecting small fish hidden within the seagrass canopy, predators that search for and encounter prey from a concealed position (e.g., ambush predators and wait-chase predators) or fast cruising predators which are easily overlooked during their brief appearance in regular transects (Kruschel and Schultz, 2012). A significant difference in abundance was found between complex mosaic meadows and continuous meadows bordering rock/bordering sand.…”
Section: The Fish Assemblage Of Posidonia Oceanica Meadowsmentioning
confidence: 99%