2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of formation pressure test results over a hydrate interval for long-term production forecasting at the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope: Implications of uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the Mallik 2002 MDT tests, the individual Mount Elbert tests were of longer duration, with the tests ranging from 6 to nearly 13 h to further enhance data interpretability. Acquisition of this open-hole, dual-packer MDT data confirm earlier results obtained at Mallik (Dallimore and Collett, 2005;Hancock et al, 2004) and indicate ability to technically recover gas from gas hydrates through depressurization (Pooladi- Darvish and Hong, 2011;Anderson et al, 2011a;Kurihara et al, 2011). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Formation Pressure Testing Program Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to the Mallik 2002 MDT tests, the individual Mount Elbert tests were of longer duration, with the tests ranging from 6 to nearly 13 h to further enhance data interpretability. Acquisition of this open-hole, dual-packer MDT data confirm earlier results obtained at Mallik (Dallimore and Collett, 2005;Hancock et al, 2004) and indicate ability to technically recover gas from gas hydrates through depressurization (Pooladi- Darvish and Hong, 2011;Anderson et al, 2011a;Kurihara et al, 2011). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Formation Pressure Testing Program Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results conform well to the pre-drill prediction . The MDT results significantly improved understanding of the in-situ petrophysics of the reservoir and provided insight into reservoir response to local depressurization through free water withdrawal and associated gas production from hydrate dissociation (Anderson et al, 2011a;Pooladi-Darvish and Hong, 2011;Kurihara et al, 2011). Reservoir modeling indicates that the ability of the gas hydrate-bearing porous media to transmit a pressure front could be a key parameter to enable pressure-depletion drive during production testing (Wilson et al, 2011), provided temperatures do not fall below freezing, which would effectively transform the small remaining mobile fluid phase into an immobile ice phase.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid flow potential was measured in four open interval flow tests that ranged from 6 to 12 hours each. These datasets were evaluated through history matching by several numerical models (Anderson et al, 2011a, Kurihara et al, 2011, Pooladi-Darvish and Hong, 2011 1.3 Gas hydrates in nature and provided data for evaluation of potential long-term production (Anderson et al, 2011b, Collett et al, 2012a, Wilson et al, 2011. The stratigraphic well confirmed intervals with 60-75% S h within reservoir quality sand.…”
Section: Mount Elbertmentioning
confidence: 99%