2015
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.150004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Fractal Analysis for the Discrimination of Trabecular Changes Between Individuals With Healthy Gingiva or Moderate Periodontitis

Abstract: Fractal analysis can quantitatively discriminate the trabecular integrity alterations induced by periodontitis and therefore can be recommended for the diagnosis and monitoring of changes in trabecular architecture associated with periodontitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
20
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The average of the values of two ROIs was used to calculate the average fractal dimension for each subject, to discriminate the trabecular integrity alterations induced by periodontitis, using the box counting method described by White and Rudolph. 22,24 All image analysis was performed using ImageJ software (v.1.51j8; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA). 200 ROIs were duplicated using the Gaussian filter blurred with a diameter of 35 pixels.…”
Section: Radiographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average of the values of two ROIs was used to calculate the average fractal dimension for each subject, to discriminate the trabecular integrity alterations induced by periodontitis, using the box counting method described by White and Rudolph. 22,24 All image analysis was performed using ImageJ software (v.1.51j8; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA). 200 ROIs were duplicated using the Gaussian filter blurred with a diameter of 35 pixels.…”
Section: Radiographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, the diagnosis of peri‐implant disease is based on the collective analysis of radiographic changes in alveolar bone over time and the clinical presentation of the peri‐implant mucosa (presence or absence of inflammation‐bleeding on probing (BOP) coupled with an increased probing depth (PD)) (Rosen et al., 2013). However, two‐dimensional radiographs are subject to distortion and magnification which makes comparison of sequential films difficult (Sener, Cinarcik, & Baksi, 2015). Furthermore, a baseline radiograph of the implant may not be available from which to make such comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractal analysis is an alternative method of assessing changes in alveolar bone trabeculation patterns on radiographs, which avoids the problems associated with projection geometry (Sener et al., 2015). Fractal dimension (FD) measurements, calculated through fractal analysis, were shown to be relatively insensitive to variations in radiographic angulation, radiodensity, or radiographic machine settings, supporting its use as a diagnostic tool of nonstandardized periapical radiographs (Jolley, Majumdar, & Kapila, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractal analysis derives from fractal geometry and is used to calculate fractal dimension (FD), which is an index of the space-filling properties of an object. FD has been used to quantitatively assess trabecular bone changes on X-ray [2][3][4][5] and it is a promising method for the early detection of bone breakdown and bone regeneration. However, to the best of authors' knowledge, there is no study testing the capability of fractal analysis for the discrimination of different pattern of trabecular bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%