1998
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1997.0573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Physiological Indices as a Screening Technique for Drought Tolerance in OilseedBrassicaSpecies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In domesticated B. rapa, net photosynthesis was 13.0 mmol m (2 s (1 (SE 0.36) with a stomatal resistance of 2.2 s cm (1 (SE 0.07). Similar values of stomatal conductance were reported in six B. napus and four B. rapa genotypes by Kumar and Singh (1998) with lower stomatal conductance on average in B. rapa. Uprety et al (1995) found greater chlorophyll content in B. napus (1.5 mg g (1 FW, SE 0.04) than in B. rapa (1.1 mg g (1 FW, SE 0.02).…”
Section: Historysupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In domesticated B. rapa, net photosynthesis was 13.0 mmol m (2 s (1 (SE 0.36) with a stomatal resistance of 2.2 s cm (1 (SE 0.07). Similar values of stomatal conductance were reported in six B. napus and four B. rapa genotypes by Kumar and Singh (1998) with lower stomatal conductance on average in B. rapa. Uprety et al (1995) found greater chlorophyll content in B. napus (1.5 mg g (1 FW, SE 0.04) than in B. rapa (1.1 mg g (1 FW, SE 0.02).…”
Section: Historysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In general, rooting depth and total root dry matter production were greater in B. napus than in B. rapa, and Richards and Thurling (1979) suggested that this may be due to differences in time to maturity between these species. In India, maximum soil moisture extraction was 1 to 3 cm H 2 O per 30 cm depth between 30 and 150 cm soil depth, while soil moisture extraction between 150 and 180 cm declined sharply in two B. napus and two B. rapa genotypes (Kumar and Singh 1998). In contrast, Kumar et al (1987) reported lower total moisture extraction in five domesticated B. napus genotypes (175 to 184 mm H 2 O) than in three domesticated B. rapa genotypes (186 to 215 mm H 2 O).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4), which are important leaf anatomical characteristics for restricting leaf water loss through cuticle transpiration under drought conditions. Osmotic adjustment also enables the plants to maintain higher tissue water content, turgor and turgor-related processes during water deficit as reported in many crop species (Morgan et al, 1986;Ritchie et al, 1990;Kumar and Singh, 1998). In this study, there was a small decrease in osmotic potential, -1.0 to -0.87 MPa with a larger decrease in leaf water potential, -0.92 to -0.65 MPa (Table 1) indicating limited or no osmotic adjustment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…LIMA et al (2011), ao avaliarem o crescimento desta mesma variedade de girassol ornamental em vasos e casa de vegetação, em Fortaleza-CE, sob as mesmas concentrações testadas, verificaram que uma única aplicação durante o ciclo da cultura não foi suficiente para reduzir sua altura, pressupondo-se que tal efeito tenha sido devido às altas temperaturas de Fortaleza, registradas durante o cultivo. Diante desta verificação, CUQUEL te al.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Reduzidas trocas gasosas das plantas em areia podem ter sido provocadas pelos baixos teores de nutrientes e pela capacidade de retenção de água inferior em relação ao substrato FC (Tabela 1), uma vez que as atividades fotossintéticas das plantas estão diretamente relacionadas ao conteúdo de água no meio onde estão sendo cultivadas, e plantas com um balanço nutricional adequado são eficientes em manter sua capacidade fotossintética (TAIZ & ZEIGER, 2004). KUMAR & SINGH (1998) citam que deficiências hídricas podem reduzir o potencial hídrico das plantas, causando, com isso, diminuição na turgescência, na condutância estomática e na fotossíntese, provocando redução no crescimento e na produtividade às plantas. Diante de tal afirmação, percebe-se que a retenção de água inferior apresentada pelo substrato areia, quando comparado ao FC, pode, possivelmente, ter provocado estresse hídrico nestas plantas, afetando, assim, suas trocas gasosas.…”
Section: Effects Of Daminozide Concentrations On : (A) the Number Of unclassified