Use of Plant Introductions To Improve Populations and Hybrids of Sugarbeet

Lewellen, R. T.

doi:10.2135/cssaspecpub20.c5

Cited by 21 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Narrow genetic background was described among Egyptian sugar beet and sugar beet genetic resources from USA (Coons 1936;Bosemark 1979;Lewellen 1992 andPanella 1996). Top crosses between American sugar beet genotypes with Egyptian table beets code increase the genetic diversity and transfer adapted genes to Egyptian condition to sugar beet gene pool.…”

Section: Results and Discussion Top Crosses Between Sugar Beet X Tablmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic Analysis of Root and Hypocotyl Color Traits in Sugar Beet

2013

Alexandria Science Exchange Journal: An International Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present research was carried out in Sabahia Agricultural Research Station, Alexandria, Egypt, (2010-2013) to study root and hypocotyl colors traits in sugar beet in F 2 plants derived from hybridization among sugar beet multigerm diploid American inbred line (C39) and Egyptian table beet. In addition to, Gene frequency of hypocotyl colors (Red, Pink and green) in the three multigerm sugar beet populations introduced from USA "3859 (Sp), Z120 and 3915 (Sp)". Results revealed that F 2 phenotype seedlings from (C39 X Table beets) were segregated to three groups according to leaf, hypocotyl and root colors. The main synopsis are gene frequency of hypocotyl colors in the three examined populations indicated that green hypocotyl (rr) were presented in rear percentages (eg, 0.016, 0.01 and 0.02) in populations "3859 (Sp), Z120 and 3915 (Sp)" in the three examined populations, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Results and Discussion Top Crosses Between Sugar Beet X Tablmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic Analysis of Root and Hypocotyl Color Traits in Sugar Beet

2013

Alexandria Science Exchange Journal: An International Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After the early 1980s, a shift, which reflected the changing philosophy of ARS-USDA and the sugarbeet industry in the objectives for public sugarbeet breeding, was made at Salinas that moved the breeding program away from development of finished parental lines and hybrid cultivars to germplasm enhancement and the use of broadly based genetic resources (Lewellen, 1992;Lewellen, 2000;Biancardi et al, 2012). The use of all genetic resources was then incorporated into the programs at Salinas.…”

Section: Sugarbeet Breeding Kimberly Idahomentioning

confidence: 99%

USDA-ARS Sugarbeet Releases and Breeding Over the Past 20 Years

Panella¹,

Campbell²,

Eujayl³

et al. 2015

JSBR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1995, Devon Doney published a comprehensive list of germplasm releases, breeding lines, and hybrids that had been developed by USDA ARS plant breeders. Doney's summary has been valuable in documenting the wide range of activities that resulted in useful germplasm resources as well as defining actual germplasm that has contributed to a sustained and profitable sugar beet industry. This report includes Doney's summary tables, as well as updates and extends the list of germplasm resources released over the past 20 years. The purpose and focus of the ARS public breeding effort has changed over the last 75 years from developing and releasing open pollinated cultivars and then hybrid cultivars to a focus on pre-breeding of enhanced germplasm. What has not changed is the close collaboration that the ARS public plant breeders have with private industry breeders. This report details the breadth of germplasm enhancement activities of the five ARS locations currently releasing enhanced germplasm (East Lansing, MI; Fargo, ND; Fort Collins, CO; Kimberly, ID; Salinas, CA). It places these activities in a broader context than often communicated in formal germplasm release notices or germplasm registration articles. Recent germplasm releases are freely available from their developers through the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System. Some of the older germplasm described here may not be directly available, however much of this germplasm has been the foundation of current enhanced germplasm and the

show abstract

“…US35 originated from 16 plants selected from US22/3 (PI 590708). US22/3 was a commercial cultivar with high curly top resistance grown in the western United States in the late 1940s and early 1950s (Murphy et al, 1948;Lewellen, 1992). Ovana is a curly top susceptible Danish fodder beet cultivar (Stout et al, 1961).…”

Section: Population Formation and Line Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

F1030, F1031, and F1032 Sugarbeet Germplasms Selected from Crosses between L19 and Three Cultivated/Wild Germplasms

Campbell

2015

Journal of Plant Registrations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Use of Plant Introductions To Improve Populations and Hybrids of Sugarbeet

Cited by 21 publications

References 32 publications

Genetic Analysis of Root and Hypocotyl Color Traits in Sugar Beet

Genetic Analysis of Root and Hypocotyl Color Traits in Sugar Beet

USDA-ARS Sugarbeet Releases and Breeding Over the Past 20 Years

F1030, F1031, and F1032 Sugarbeet Germplasms Selected from Crosses between L19 and Three Cultivated/Wild Germplasms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About