2003
DOI: 10.1080/07303300310001634961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Synchrotron Diffraction Data for Describing Crystal Structure and Crystallographic Phase Analysis of R‐Phase NiTi Shape Memory Alloy

Abstract: 2002b). Texture and quantitative phase analysis of aged Ni-rich NiTi using X-ray and neutron diffractions. Materials Science Forum, 394-395, 237-240.) showed that Rietveld refinement with generalized spherical harmonic (GSH) description for neutron powder diffraction (ND) data of the aged (673 K, 20 h) Ni-rich NiTi shape memory alloy (Sitepu H. (2002). Assessment of preferred orientation with neutron powder diffraction data. J. Appl. Cryst, 35, 274-277); of nominal composition 50.7 at.% Ni at 294 K consists o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They claim that the variation in the interatomic distances become smaller by choosing P 3 rather than P3. Sitepu [113] also carried out synchrotron radiation experiments of powder sample, and obtained the results indicating that R p R wp , and v 2 (goodness of fit indices), except for R(F 2 ), which is R-factor with respect to F 2 , are better for P3 than for P 3, but he claims to support P 3, as Schryvers and Potapov suggested. Since the difference between the two is very subtle, we may need to wait a little more time until to arrive at the final determination.…”
Section: Crystal Structure Of the R-phasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…They claim that the variation in the interatomic distances become smaller by choosing P 3 rather than P3. Sitepu [113] also carried out synchrotron radiation experiments of powder sample, and obtained the results indicating that R p R wp , and v 2 (goodness of fit indices), except for R(F 2 ), which is R-factor with respect to F 2 , are better for P3 than for P 3, but he claims to support P 3, as Schryvers and Potapov suggested. Since the difference between the two is very subtle, we may need to wait a little more time until to arrive at the final determination.…”
Section: Crystal Structure Of the R-phasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is well known that NiTi SMA combines good functional properties with high strength; therefore, it is recently the most successful shape memory material ͑Sitepu, Schmahl, Allafi et al, 2002;Sitepu, 2003Sitepu, , 2007Otsuka and Ren, 2005͒. There is an interest in Ni-rich NiTi SMAs because the phase transition temperature varies with nickel content.…”
Section: B Ni-rich Ni 507 Ti 493 Smas and Nd Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the refined atomic parameters should agree well with the structure derived from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data.͔ Since then, preferred orientation has been a part of Rietveld refinement because the method is well suited to low-symmetry compounds with many closely spaced and partially overlapped peaks, whereas it is still difficult to measure quantitative pole figures for complex X-ray powder diffraction ͑XRD͒ and ND data for such materials. The March model ͑Dollase, 1986;O'Connor et al, 1991O'Connor et al, , 1992Sitepu, , 1998Li, 2004, 2005͒, the generalized spherical-harmonic ͑GSH͒ description ͑Ahtee et al., 1989;Popa, 1992;Järvinen, 1993;Von Dreele, 1997;Bergmann et al, 2001;Sitepu et al, 2001;Sitepu, Schmahl, and Allafi et al, 2002;Sitepu, Schmahl, and Stalick, 2002;Sitepu, Schmahl, and Von Dreele, 2002;Sitepu, 2003Sitepu, , 2007Sitepu, , 2008Sitepu, O'Connor, Benmarouane et al, 2004͒, and the Williams-Imhof-Matthies-Vinel method ͑Matthies et al., 1988Lutterotti et al, 2004͒ have been successfully used to describe the texture resulting from packing effects in Bragg-Brentano and Debye-Scherrer powder diffraction measurements using Rietveld refinement programs. The descriptions of the BGMN, DBWS, FULLPROF, GSAS, LHPM, MAUD, and NXD programs and links to them can be obtained via the Collaborative Computational Project, No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the fibered texture information in this alloy proved to be useful information as a qualitative measure of texture ͓see Figure 1͑b͔͒, they did not include the preferred orientation correction in their Rietveld refinements. Therefore, their crystallographic R P , R WP , and R͑F 2 ͒ factors and refined crystal structure parameters of trigonal phase in this alloy need further studies because the powder diffraction pattern from a specimen exhibiting the preferred orientation will display intensity values that differ systematically from those of an ideal sample with random orientation ͑Sitepu et al, 2001;Sitepu, 2002Sitepu, , 2003Sitepu et al, 2004b͒. Recently, Sitepu et al ͑2005a͒ conducted a comparative evaluation of the March model ͑Dollase, 1986͒ and generalized spherical harmonic ͑GSH͒ description ͑Bunge, 1982͒ for preferred orientation using X-ray diffraction data a͒ Electronic mail: sitepu@vt.edu for molybdite and calcite powders uniaxially pressed at five different pressures with the GSAS ͑Larson and Von Dreele, 2000͒ Rietveld program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%