2006
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Amplatzer vascular occluder to occlude large venous vessels in adults and children with congenital heart disease: A case series

Abstract: We describe the use of a new vascular occlusion device to embolize vessels whose flow is detrimental to cardiac function in a variety of clinical situations in both adults and children with congenital cardiac disease. Our series includes four cases in which we have successfully occluded large venous vessels, to produce a beneficial effect on oxygen saturations and cardiac function. There were no adverse events because of the devices in our series, which provides evidence that the Amplatzer vascular plug is a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The FDA approved the amplatzer vascular plug 1 and 2 for use in May 2004, and September 2007, respectively. Since that time, there have been numerous published reports describing their utility for vascular occlusion procedures in a variety of clinical settings, including the peripheral vasculature [3], pulmonary AVMs [11–13], venous collaterals [14], aorto‐pulmonary collaterals [15], coronary fistulae [16–18], patent ductus ateriosus [7, 19], modified Blalock‐Taussig shunts [20], Fontan fenestrations [21], ventriculo‐pulmonary connections [22], vena cava aneurysms [23], perivalvular leaks [24], and porto‐systemic connections [9, 25]. The majority of these reports are small series that describe the original plug 1 device, with few reports describing plug 2 [4–6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDA approved the amplatzer vascular plug 1 and 2 for use in May 2004, and September 2007, respectively. Since that time, there have been numerous published reports describing their utility for vascular occlusion procedures in a variety of clinical settings, including the peripheral vasculature [3], pulmonary AVMs [11–13], venous collaterals [14], aorto‐pulmonary collaterals [15], coronary fistulae [16–18], patent ductus ateriosus [7, 19], modified Blalock‐Taussig shunts [20], Fontan fenestrations [21], ventriculo‐pulmonary connections [22], vena cava aneurysms [23], perivalvular leaks [24], and porto‐systemic connections [9, 25]. The majority of these reports are small series that describe the original plug 1 device, with few reports describing plug 2 [4–6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If patent ductus arteriosus is not considered, other series on percutaneous occlusion of different VM in pediatric and adult patients include smaller samples and the results are therefore difficult to compare . Larger series have only analyzed the occlusion of pulmonary arteriovenous fistulae, predominantly in adults .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical conditions in which these vascular plugs are utilized include intracardiac and extracardiac shunts, abnormal arterioarterial, arteriovenous, venovenous malformations, paravalvular leaks, tumor embolization and portosystemic shunts. [78910111213141516171819]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%