2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uses and limits of the Equivalent Frame Model on existing unreinforced masonry buildings for assessing their seismic risk: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the experimental investigations, ambient vibration tests are the main methods for assessing the seismic behavior of full-scale structures Clementi et al, 2017Clementi et al, , 2018Ubertini et al, 2017Ubertini et al, , 2018. Obtained results have been used as the basis for implementing different non-linear analysis methods Brando et al, 2017;Quagliarini et al, 2017). Mostly, more accurate results have been obtained through the use of Finite Element (FE) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the experimental investigations, ambient vibration tests are the main methods for assessing the seismic behavior of full-scale structures Clementi et al, 2017Clementi et al, , 2018Ubertini et al, 2017Ubertini et al, , 2018. Obtained results have been used as the basis for implementing different non-linear analysis methods Brando et al, 2017;Quagliarini et al, 2017). Mostly, more accurate results have been obtained through the use of Finite Element (FE) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it requires low computational effort to simulate both linear and nonlinear lateral load behavior of practical large masonry wall panels. Detailed state-of-the-art reports can be found in [139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154].…”
Section: Modeling Masonry Using Equivalent Frame Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Nakamura et al () concluded that the EF method may be nonconservative in predicting extensive building damage. In addition, the analysis accuracy relies on adequate modelling of frame behaviour (Quagliarini et al ), with the subject being an emerging research area especially for URM spandrels (Beyer and Mangalathu ). Overall, based on these limitations, it was considered appropriate to use the EF method to obtain acceleration response of the buildings in the relatively small range of PGA.…”
Section: Uncertainty In Seismic Demand Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%