2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an EfficientNet-LSTM for the recognition of single Cow’s motion behaviours in a complicated environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also non-contact and does not need to touch the animal for identification, so does not cause stress and can provide continuous long-term monitoring [ 10 ]. Many scholars have applied deep learning to cows [ 11 , 12 ]. Zhao et al [ 13 ] collected side-view videos of cows walking in a straight line to study and evaluate image processing techniques, including four feature extraction methods and two matching methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also non-contact and does not need to touch the animal for identification, so does not cause stress and can provide continuous long-term monitoring [ 10 ]. Many scholars have applied deep learning to cows [ 11 , 12 ]. Zhao et al [ 13 ] collected side-view videos of cows walking in a straight line to study and evaluate image processing techniques, including four feature extraction methods and two matching methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rough rule of thumb is that a supervised deep learning algorithm generally achieves good performance with around 5000 labeled instances per category [ 147 ], while 1000–5000 labeled images were generally considered in the 105 references ( Figure 7 ). The least number was 33 [ 50 ], and the largest number was 2270250 [ 84 ]. Large numbers of labeled images were used for tracking, in which continuous frames were involved.…”
Section: Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combinations had three categories. The first one was to combine multiple CNNs, such as YOLO + AlexNet [ 151 ], YOLO V2 + ResNet50 [ 98 ], and YOLO V3 + (AlexNet, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet34, DenseNet121) [ 126 ]; the second one was to combine CNNs with regular machine learning models, such as fully connected network (FCN) + support vector machine (SVM) [ 68 ], Mask region-based CNN (mask R-CNN) + kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) [ 90 ], Tiny YOLO V2 + SVM [ 121 ], VGG16 + SVM [ 49 ], YOLO + AlexNet + SVM [ 74 ], and YOLO V3 + [SVM, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree classifier (DTC)] [ 152 ]; and the third one was to combine CNNs with other deep learning techniques, such as [Convolutional 3 dimension (C3D), VGG16, ResNet50, DenseNet169, EfficientNet] + long short-term memory (LSTM) [ 84 ], Inception V3 + bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) [ 41 ], and Inception V3 + LSTM [ 153 ], YOLO V3 + LSTM [ 152 ]. In all these combinations, CNN typically played roles of feature extractors in the first stage, and then other models utilized these features to make classifications.…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fuentes et al [ 77 ] extracted temporal-context features (3D-CNN) and motion information (optical flow) from videos, achieving 78.8% recognition for 15 different hierarchical behaviours. Yin et al [ 115 ] proposed the EfficientNet-LSTM model to extract spatial feature for the recognition of cows’ motion behaviours, which achieved 97.87% behaviour recognition accuracy in the antagonism of environmental robustness. Wu et al [ 13 ] proposed CNN-LSTM (a fusion of convolutional neural network and long short-term memory) for recognising the basic behaviours of a single cow.…”
Section: Cattle Lameness Detection and Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%