1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-3123(97)90011-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using analogies to overcome student teachers' probability misconceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Kahneman and Tversky (1972) stated that for a family with 6 children, it's believed that the order of genders will more likely be MFF-MFM (M: Male; F: Female) instead of MMMMMM or MMM-FFF. It's possible to find similar results in the studies by Fast (1997) and . However, it can be suggested that these mistakes disappeared considerably in the posttest.…”
Section: Levelsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kahneman and Tversky (1972) stated that for a family with 6 children, it's believed that the order of genders will more likely be MFF-MFM (M: Male; F: Female) instead of MMMMMM or MMM-FFF. It's possible to find similar results in the studies by Fast (1997) and . However, it can be suggested that these mistakes disappeared considerably in the posttest.…”
Section: Levelsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Some of the questions were developed by the researchers, and some were developed with the help of related literature (Fast, 1997;Pratt, 2000;Baker & Chick, 2007;Nilsson, 2007Nilsson, , 2009Gürbüz, 2006b;.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also showed how coupling those tangible environments with computer simulations allow students to develop more complex theories about chance [1]. His approach is related to Fast's [11] attempt at using analogies to make concepts in probability more intuitive. By providing familiar or anchoring situations, Fast's findings suggest that analogies can prevent the activation of some misconceptions.…”
Section: Teaching Probability In a Constructivist Waymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clement was the originator of using anchoring example analogies to successfully overcome misconceptions in physics where other methods had limited success. One of the authors of this research adopted the use of anchoring examples in successfully overcoming misconceptions in the area of probability (Fast, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2007) with both high school students and preservice teachers in various educational settings including Canada, the United States, and Zimbabwe. The belief that this approach might also be successful with preservice elementary school teachers in better understanding both elementary mathematics content and pedagogy was well grounded in previous successes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essence of success in using an anchoring example in making a connection between that which is not well understood, the target situation, and that which is well known, the anchoring example, is that the anchoring example must be well understood by the student for it to be an anchor. In previous studies conducted by the one of the authors, it was shown that for the analogical approach to be effective, the student having the misconception must be confident that the anchoring example is mathematically correct and that the anchoring example is clearly analogous to the target example (Fast, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2007). Therefore, it is paramount in making a convincing case for anchoring example‐based constructivism as a best practice approach to teaching mathematics that the anchoring examples themselves are well understood and are already a part of the students' constructed knowledge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%