2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Bayesian decision for ontology mapping

Abstract: Ontology mapping is the key point to reach interoperability over ontologies. In semantic web environment, ontologies are usually distributed and heterogeneous and thus it is necessary to find the mapping between them before processing across them. Many efforts have been conducted to automate the discovery of ontology mapping. However, some problems are still evident. In this paper, ontology mapping is formalized as a problem of decision making. In this way, discovery of optimal mapping is cast as finding the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the relevant studies about property similarity, in [10], [11] some properties were taken as common properties between two concepts, the ratio of the common properties to all properties is property similarity, the method didn't consider that non-identical properties may be very similar in the semantics. In the relevant studies about instance similarity, in [12], [13] the ratio of the identical instances to all instances was used as instance similarity, but it did not be considered that the non-identical instances may have the very similar senses. In the relevant studies about structural similarities, the methods in [3], [14]- [16] took the weighted sum of similarities of super-concept, subconcept and sibling-concept as structure similarity, but the weights were given by experts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the relevant studies about property similarity, in [10], [11] some properties were taken as common properties between two concepts, the ratio of the common properties to all properties is property similarity, the method didn't consider that non-identical properties may be very similar in the semantics. In the relevant studies about instance similarity, in [12], [13] the ratio of the identical instances to all instances was used as instance similarity, but it did not be considered that the non-identical instances may have the very similar senses. In the relevant studies about structural similarities, the methods in [3], [14]- [16] took the weighted sum of similarities of super-concept, subconcept and sibling-concept as structure similarity, but the weights were given by experts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these methods would be unable to effectively deal with the large-scale ontology mapping task. There are also some famous ontology mapping systems, such as GLUE [12], QOM [28], Similarity Flooding [29], PROMPT [30], Falcon-AO [31], RiMOM [13], LILY [32], Cupid [33], and ASMOV [34]. From the aggregation view, though Falcon-AO measures both linguistic comparability and structural comparability of ontologies to estimate the reliability of matched entity pairs, it only uses them to form three heuristic rules to integrate results generated by GMO [35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APFEL [16] uses an average weight function, similar to the first version of MapPso. RIMOM [15] uses risk minimization to search for optimal mappings from the results of multiple strategies. It utilizes a sigmoid function with a set of experimental parameters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RiMOM [20] is a general ontology mapping system based on Bayesian decision theory and the approach divides the process of discovering complex mapping (m:1 mapping) into two steps: mapping entities discovery and mapping expression discovery. We mainly focus on mapping entities discovery.…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%