2010
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Complex Auditory—visual Samples to Produce Emergent Relations in Children With Autism

Abstract: Six participants with autism learned conditional relations between complex auditory-visual sample stimuli (dictated words and pictures) and simple visual comparisons (printed words) using matching-to-sample training procedures. Pre- and posttests examined potential stimulus control by each element of the complex sample when presented individually and emergence of additional conditional relations and oral labeling. Tests revealed class-consistent performance for all participants following training.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, these results provide additional support for the efficacy of complex samples to teach conditional discriminations to children (Groskreutz et al, ; Lane & Critchfield, ; Stromer & Mackay, ). Across participants, no consistent differences among conditions were noted in terms of generalization or the emergence of derived relations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In sum, these results provide additional support for the efficacy of complex samples to teach conditional discriminations to children (Groskreutz et al, ; Lane & Critchfield, ; Stromer & Mackay, ). Across participants, no consistent differences among conditions were noted in terms of generalization or the emergence of derived relations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This procedural modification also produces many more new relations than standard training with unitary stimuli (e.g., Groskreutz, Karsina, Miguel, & Groskreutz, 2010;Maguire, Stromer, Mackay, & Demis, 1994;Markham & Dougher, 1993). These outcomes of the different ways of using multielement stimuli demonstrate how the efficiency of typical training may be improved.…”
Section: Semantic Repertoires: Contingencies and Equivalence Relationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…During symmetry and transitivity tests these stimuli were decomposed and presented separately, sometimes as samples and sometimes as comparisons, to evaluate the established conditional relations (see also, Carpentier, Smeets, & Barnes-Holmes, 2000;Groskreutz, Karsina, Miguel, & Groskreutz, 2010;Guerrero, Alós, & Moriana, 2015;Maguire, Stromer, Mackay, & Demis, 1994;Pérez-González & Alonso-Álva-rez, 2008;Ribeiro, Miguel, & Goyos, 2015).…”
Section: Stimulus Arrangement In Simple Discriminative Training With mentioning
confidence: 99%