2013
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2013.2241797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Data-Mining Approaches for Wind Turbine Power Curve Monitoring: A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed approaches exhibited small error rates, with values occurring in the range 0.8 m/s to 0.9 m/s. Even though wind speed and output power of a wind generator have a proportional relation (Schlechtingen [7] insisted that temperature and wind direction affect wind power), our study predicts not wind power but long-term hourly wind speed.…”
Section: Wind Power Pattern Forecasting Based On Projected Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed approaches exhibited small error rates, with values occurring in the range 0.8 m/s to 0.9 m/s. Even though wind speed and output power of a wind generator have a proportional relation (Schlechtingen [7] insisted that temperature and wind direction affect wind power), our study predicts not wind power but long-term hourly wind speed.…”
Section: Wind Power Pattern Forecasting Based On Projected Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Kusiak and others [2] suggested five non-parametric models for monitoring wind farm power; that is, a neural network (NN), M5 tree, representative tree, bagging tree, and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), the last of which showed the best performance. Unlike existing studies, Schlechtingen and others [7] added ambient temperature and wind direction in addition to wind speed as prediction model inputs, as well as applying four data mining techniques. The applied prediction models were CCFL, NNs, k-NN, and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference system (ANFIS).…”
Section: Wind Power Pattern Forecasting Based On Projected Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem Specific Methodology Used [3] 2015 Sea wave Ordinal classification SVM, ANN, LR [4] 2015 Solar Classification SVM [5] 2009 Power disturbance Classification SVM, wavelets [10] 2015 Wind Optimization Bio-inspired, meta-heuristics [14] 2015 Wind Classification Fuzzy SVM [15] 2011 Wind Classification DT, SOM [16] 2015 Wind Classification SVM, k-NN, fuzzy, ANN [17] 2010 Solar Classification Semi-supervised SVM [20] 2013 Wind Ordinal classification SVM, DT, LR, HMM [30] 2014 Wind Classification SVM, LR, RF, rotation forest [31] 2011 Wind Classification ANN, LR, DT, RF [32] 2013 Wind Classification k-NN, RBF, DT [33] 2011 Wind Classification, regression BN [34] 2014 Wind Classification, regression Heuristic methodology: WPPT [35] 2011 Wind Classification Bagging, ripper, rotation forest, RF, k-NN [36] 2013 Wind Classification ANFIS, ANN [37] 2012 Wind Classification SVM [38] 2015 Wind Classification ANN, SVM [39] 2015 Wind Classification PNN [40] 2015 Wind Classification DT, BN, RF [41] 2015 Wind Classification, clustering AuDyC [42] 2016 Wind Classification, clustering AuDyC [43] 2010 Power disturbance Classification HMM, SVM, ANN [44] 2015 Power disturbance Classification SVM, NN, fuzzy, neuro-fuzzy, wavelets, GA [45] 2015 Power disturbance Classification SVM, k-NN, ANN, fuzzy, wavelets [46] 2002 Power disturbance Classification Rule-based classifiers, wavelets, HMM [47] 2004 Power disturbance Classification PNN [48] 2006 Power disturbance Classification ANN, RBF, SVM [49] 2007 Power disturbance Classification ANN, wavelets [50] 2012 Power disturbance Classification PNN [51] 2014 Power disturbance Classification ANN Table 3. Summary of the main references analyzed, grouped by application field, problem type and methodologies considered (II)...…”
Section: Reference Year Application Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WT power curve, which could provide the relationship between power output and wind speed, is one of the most common tools in anomaly detection and performance analysis of WTs [15]. Different SCADA data mining approaches, such as neural networks (NNs) [16,17], adaptive neuron-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) [17], k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) [17,18], bagging tree [18], and the generalized mapping regressor [19], PC2-Dev [20] were used for modeling the WT power curve and the anomaly detection capabilities of the models were analyzed. It was shown that the abnormal conditions of the WTs can be detected by using the residuals between the predicted power and observed power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%