Proceedings of the Workshop on Linking Natural Language Processing and Biology Towards Deeper Biological Literature Analysis - 2006
DOI: 10.3115/1567619.1567641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using dependency parsing and probabilistic inference to extract relationships between genes, proteins and malignancies implicit among multiple biomedical research abstracts

Abstract: We describe BioLiterate, a prototype software system which infers relationships involving relationships between genes, proteins and malignancies from research abstracts, and has initially been tested in the domain of the molecular genetics of oncology. The architecture uses a natural language processing module to extract entities, dependencies and simple semantic relationships from texts, and then feeds these features into a probabilistic reasoning module which combines the semantic relationships extracted by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(This system is also the only one that explicitly targets NP-external arguments of the nominalization.) Goertzel et al (2006) [17] describes a system that contains a “nominalization recognition” component; it is not clear what processing, if any, the recognized nominalizations undergo, and the system is currently in an unevaluated, prototype stage of development. Schuman and Bergler (2006) [18] do not include an interpretive component, but they demonstrate the ability to produce accurate syntactic attachment for post-nominal prepositional phrases using a corpus-based approach, achieving 82% accuracy for this task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(This system is also the only one that explicitly targets NP-external arguments of the nominalization.) Goertzel et al (2006) [17] describes a system that contains a “nominalization recognition” component; it is not clear what processing, if any, the recognized nominalizations undergo, and the system is currently in an unevaluated, prototype stage of development. Schuman and Bergler (2006) [18] do not include an interpretive component, but they demonstrate the ability to produce accurate syntactic attachment for post-nominal prepositional phrases using a corpus-based approach, achieving 82% accuracy for this task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BioLiterate, a system developed by Goertzel et al [ 9 ], is designed to discover relations which are not contained in any individual abstract using probabilistic inference. In contrast to this work their approach is based on a collection of hand-built rules, that map linguistic constructs onto a probabilistic reasoning system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OpenCog has been used for commercial applications in the area of natural language processing and data mining; e.g. see [GPPG06]. It has also been used to control virtual agents in virtual worlds, at first using an OpenCog variant called the OpenPetBrain [GEA08], and more recently in a more general way using a Minecraft-like virtual environment [GPC + 11].…”
Section: Opencogmentioning
confidence: 99%