2014
DOI: 10.1111/coin.12024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Hashtags to Capture Fine Emotion Categories from Tweets

Abstract: Detecting emotions in microblogs and social media posts has applications for industry, health, and security. Statistical, supervised automatic methods for emotion detection rely on text that is labeled for emotions, but such data are rare and available for only a handful of basic emotions. In this article, we show that emotion-word hashtags are good manual labels of emotions in tweets. We also propose a method to generate a large lexicon of word-emotion associations from this emotion-labeled tweet corpus. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We always convert a message to lowercase before feeding it to the models. (Saif and Kiritchenko, 2015), and SentiWordNet (Baccianella et al, 2010) with traditional NLP features like word-and character ngrams, POS tags (Gimpel et al, 2011), and processing of negations. In addition to those features, AffectiveTweets incorporates SentiStrength values (Thelwall et al, 2012), Brown clusters (Brown et al, 1992) trained on ∼53 million tweets 2 , combining them with averaged and concatenated first k word embeddings of the tweet.…”
Section: Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We always convert a message to lowercase before feeding it to the models. (Saif and Kiritchenko, 2015), and SentiWordNet (Baccianella et al, 2010) with traditional NLP features like word-and character ngrams, POS tags (Gimpel et al, 2011), and processing of negations. In addition to those features, AffectiveTweets incorporates SentiStrength values (Thelwall et al, 2012), Brown clusters (Brown et al, 1992) trained on ∼53 million tweets 2 , combining them with averaged and concatenated first k word embeddings of the tweet.…”
Section: Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of sentiments in short informal texts is described in [22] and in [27]. In [22] the authors present a system for sentiment detection based on a supervised statistical text classification approach and derive the sentiment features from tweet-specific sentiment lexicons.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] the authors present a system for sentiment detection based on a supervised statistical text classification approach and derive the sentiment features from tweet-specific sentiment lexicons. The work in [27] shows emotion-word hashtags as good labels for emotions in tweets and proposes the use of emotion-labeled tweets as a method to generate a word-emotion association lexicon.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the high effort of manual annotation, [17] and [18] created a large corpus of emotional tweets by specifically searching for Twitter messages containing one of the six emotion words as hashtags. This corpus is used to train and cross-validate support vector machines that classify the six basic emotions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%