2000
DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(2000)019<1097:uhbdte>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Historical Biological Data to Evaluate Status and Trends in the Big Darby Creek Watershed (Ohio, Usa)

Abstract: Abstract-Assessment of watershed ecological status and trends is challenging for managers who lack randomly or consistently sampled data, or monitoring programs developed from a watershed perspective. This study investigated analytical approaches for assessment of status and trends using data collected by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency as part of state requirements for reporting stream quality and managing discharge permits. Fish and benthic macroinvertebrate metrics collected during three time perio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particularly high MSPRs for the Lag and Stream ID models indicate that the spatial structure of the data changed from the earlier time period to the later. This conclusion is supported by an analysis of the historical trends in one of the streams—the Big Darby Creek [19]. In that study, a higher degree of spatial correlation was seen in the time periods of 1986 to 1993, which would roughly correspond to the period of time of the training data set, as compared to an earlier time period of 1979 to 1981.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The particularly high MSPRs for the Lag and Stream ID models indicate that the spatial structure of the data changed from the earlier time period to the later. This conclusion is supported by an analysis of the historical trends in one of the streams—the Big Darby Creek [19]. In that study, a higher degree of spatial correlation was seen in the time periods of 1986 to 1993, which would roughly correspond to the period of time of the training data set, as compared to an earlier time period of 1979 to 1981.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The federally endangered Scioto madtom ( Noturus trautmani ), known only from the Big Darby Creek, and the eastern sand darter ( Am‐mocrypta pellucida ) (under review for federal listing) have not been collected in the watershed since 1957 and 1960, respectively [2]. Biological surveys by the OEPA have indicated decreases in biological indices of fish and macroinvertebrate communities in some stream reaches, whereas others have shown improvement (OEPA draft report, 1999) [13]. Although the total number of fish species has declined over the past 50 years, longitudinal profiles of the Big Darby suggest that more recently, improvement has occurred in the fish (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the completion of the Big Darby problem formulation, on-going analyses are being conducted that will ultimately be integrated into risk characterization and implemented in risk management. Specific analyses that grew out of the problem formulation of the Big Darby Creek watershed ecological risk assessment will be discussed in the papers that follow [13,27,70,71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The federally endangered Scioto madtom (Noturus trautmani), known only from the Big Darby Creek, and the eastern sand darter (Ammocrypta pellucida) (under review for federal listing) have not been collected in the watershed since 1957 and 1960, respectively [2]. Biological surveys by the OEPA have indicated decreases in biological indices of fish and macroinvertebrate communities in some stream reaches, whereas others have shown improvement (OEPA draft report, 1999) [13]. Although the total number of fish species has declined over the past 50 years, longitudinal profiles of the Big Darby suggest that more recently, improvement has occurred in the fish ( Fig.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation