2017
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6601a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using National Inpatient Death Rates as a Benchmark to Identify Hospitals with Inaccurate Cause of Death Reporting — Missouri, 2009–2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…58 Finally, when comparing effect sizes for different causes of death, one should consider variations in reporting accuracy among them, with heart disease being more prone to inaccurate reporting. 59 We found little evidence for an interaction by sex, age, and socioeconomic status for all the variables in our study. The meat variables generally showed an interaction with other effect modifiers, and the effects were more pronounced in the absence of another important risk factor.…”
Section: Possible Mechanistic Explanationscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…58 Finally, when comparing effect sizes for different causes of death, one should consider variations in reporting accuracy among them, with heart disease being more prone to inaccurate reporting. 59 We found little evidence for an interaction by sex, age, and socioeconomic status for all the variables in our study. The meat variables generally showed an interaction with other effect modifiers, and the effects were more pronounced in the absence of another important risk factor.…”
Section: Possible Mechanistic Explanationscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Further examination of trends in ME/C contact from 2010 to 2012 showed an increase in ME/C contact over time as well as trend differences by location (e.g., clinic/hospital, nursing home/hospice, and home/other). The significant 18% increased odds for ME/C certification after the implementation of the electronic death reporting system is encouraging, as MOD and COD are more accurate when an ME/C has been contacted . We also found that when the MOD was unnatural, the odds of ME/C certification were 108 times greater than when the MOD was classified as natural, which was expected and confirmed strong adherence to state statute requiring ME/C certification for certain causes of death.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Some studies retrospectively used skilled adjudicators to compare medical records to death certificates. One found an error rate of 39% in a national cohort including 336 deaths [23]; another conducted in selected Kansas City and St. Louis hospitals found an error rate of 45.8% [24]. A study in Vermont revealed that 51% of death certificates completed by non-medical examiners had major errors, and that certificates for hospital deaths were more error prone than those completed for residential deaths (59% vs. 39% errors) [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%