2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00355-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using real time information for effective dynamic scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
120
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
120
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…in the paper of Cowling and Johansson (2002) the simulationbased execution of the calculated schedules is introduced considering uncertain activity durations in the form of probability distributions. Regarding the robustness and flexibility of tardiness and total flow-time in job-shops, several schedule repair methods are investigated in (Jensen, 2001), and an experiment is performed on a set of benchmark problems by executing schedules against simulated machine breakdowns.…”
Section: Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the paper of Cowling and Johansson (2002) the simulationbased execution of the calculated schedules is introduced considering uncertain activity durations in the form of probability distributions. Regarding the robustness and flexibility of tardiness and total flow-time in job-shops, several schedule repair methods are investigated in (Jensen, 2001), and an experiment is performed on a set of benchmark problems by executing schedules against simulated machine breakdowns.…”
Section: Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The event handling process typically consists of the following stages in practice: detection, identification, evaluation, diagnosis and decision making: When an unexpected event occurs it should be first detected by automated technologies or humans like operators [3]. The identification stage underlies the causes of the deviation, the context of the event for priority determination [15], and determines the relevant parties and information to handle the event.…”
Section: Event Handling Process and Underlying Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that must be captured and responded effectively, namely timely and appropriately [2]. However, the difficulty of addressing the issue of uncertainty in dynamic manufacturing environments is well recognized by researchers and practitioners for many decades [3][4][5]. Hence, this study questions: What important factors have been identified in literature to handle the unexpected events effectively and what insights can we get from companies, regarding the event handling process and identified factors?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The analytical solutions proposed in [25] are able to estimate important performance measures for schedule evaluation methods in a dynamic, stochastic manufacturing system, and are evaluated in simulation testbeds. In [4] and [6] the simulation-based execution of the calculated schedules is introduced considering uncertain activity durations in the form of probability distributions. Regarding the robustness and flexibility of tardiness and total flow-time in job-shops, several schedule repair methods are investigated in [12], and an experiment is performed on a set of benchmark problems by executing schedules against simulated machine breakdowns.…”
Section: Production Control and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%