Remote Sensing of Biomass - Principles and Applications 2012
DOI: 10.5772/17353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Remote Sensing to Estimate a Renewable Resource: Forest Residual Biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9] Moreover, extending this method to map forest biomass across a large area is extremely challenging when factors such as ecological differences, variations in inventory systems, and scattered sources of biomass data are considered. 15 Additionally, remote sensing is the best approach to estimate biomass at a regional level where field data are scarce or difficult to collect. 10 There have been efforts in developing generalized regional and national tree biomass equations that could be applied to a larger geographic footprint than most existing allometric equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Moreover, extending this method to map forest biomass across a large area is extremely challenging when factors such as ecological differences, variations in inventory systems, and scattered sources of biomass data are considered. 15 Additionally, remote sensing is the best approach to estimate biomass at a regional level where field data are scarce or difficult to collect. 10 There have been efforts in developing generalized regional and national tree biomass equations that could be applied to a larger geographic footprint than most existing allometric equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a limitation to using remotely sensed data in the estimation of forest residual biomass are relating to; only feasible in monoculture forest and field operation has to be conducted, inaccuracies related to heterogeneity. However, despite all these limitations, the size of the scenes and cheap distribution, make remote sensing the most suitable for estimation of forest residual biomass (FRB) [80]. The below-ground biomass is larger than above-ground biomass, but it is impossible to estimate their magnitude directly with the existing remote sensing system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mediterranean forests have received little attention compared to other forest types [52], partly because the complexity of the terrain, environmental conditions, and heterogeneity (in terms of species and structure) of these forests presents major difficulties for consistent estimation of AGB over large areas [53]. Most studies have focused on modeled relationships between optical data field measurements of AGB.…”
Section: Mediterranean Forests Woodlands and Scrubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Cistus scrub in southeastern Portugal, [54] exploited seasonal differences in the Landsat NDVI to map AGB and 74 % of estimates were within 50 % of the reference measurements (R 2 =0.75). For Mediterranean pine forests in northeastern Spain, [53] generated maps of forest residual biomass (FRB; comprising branches, foliage, and unmerchantable stem tops) using a multiple linear regression between Landsat-5 TM data and forest inventory data (relative RMSE of 26.7 % or 4.8 Mg ha [56] estimated AGB fractions using small footprint discrete return LIDAR intensity data; species-specific models outperformed generic models (with R 2 values >0.7). RMSE values for AGB ranged between 9.7 and 18.5 Mg ha −1 for stands dominated by Holm oak (Quercus ilex) and black pine (Pinus nigra), respectively.…”
Section: Mediterranean Forests Woodlands and Scrubmentioning
confidence: 99%