Using systemic functional linguistic metafunction as a tool in identifying Agency in organizational change in cross-cultural management contexts

Abstract

This contribution addresses the echoing sentiment that the function of language is not enough focused on in management as an academic discipline even as it is acknowledged that language lies at the heart of international business (IB) activities that take place in crosscultural management (CCM) contexts. Organizations operate in contexts of uncertainty and change, finding themselves increasingly having to navigate in cross-cultural environments in the context of globalization and international management. Yet, few studies outside the field of applied linguistics (especially discourse analysis) have used language as an instrumental tool in uncovering the subtle workings of influence in organizational change. Scholastic literature in CCM suggests that language in IB is generally studied in two broad dimensions of inquiry-language as (i) object/phenomenon (nature of language) and as (ii) process/function (nature of meaning from language). Because organizational change can be difficult to define when looking at it as a broad process over time, this article addresses the latter nature of language in CCM and IB studies in illustrating how language metafunctions can be used as a methodological tool in analysing qualitative data in order to uncover Agency or actors of influence in processes of organization change in a crosscultural working context.

Have Your Texts Been Well-Structured? Mood Block Analysis

“…This study was conducted in one of the colleges in Garut with an English education department major. Moreover, the instrument in this study is a collection of texts, precisely six recount texts that were selected with the students' levels of writing recount text using the writing rubric in general aspects from Brown (2001). Moreover, those texts were analyzed inductively using the steps from McMillan (1992) and Nunan (1992), including identification, classification, and interpretation.…”

Languages and Cross-Cultural Management

“…These special issues derive largely from GEM&L conferences and symbolise ongoing developments in the field. They carry forward established themes such as crosscultural team dynamics and intergroup processes Vigier & Spencer-Oatey, 2017;Woo & Giles, 2017); language policy and use Cordeiro, 2017;Gaibrois & Steyaert, 2017;Lønsmann, 2017;Wilmot, 2017); translation in terms of transferability of concepts (Tréguer-Felten, 2017) and translator agency (Tietze et al, 2017). These special issues broadened and deepened the streams of inquiry of the field.…”

Using social networking applications to facilitate change implementation processes: insights from organizational change stakeholders

“…Researchers have discussed organizational change in the context of different disciplines such as in strategic management (Kuusela et al , 2017), accounting (Christensen et al , 2019), environments (Henri et al , 2017), economic crises (Juliboni and De Hilal, 2018), cross-cultural dynamics (Cordeiro, 2017), knowledge management (Aslam et al , 2018a) and psychological issues (Hosking and Anderson, 2018). Different studies also highlight that between 40 and 70% of efforts related to organizational change fail (Balogun and Hailey, 2004; Beer and Nohria, 2000; Hammer and Champy, 1993).…”