2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to identify parameter weights for developing a water quality index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
88
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Decisions in start-ups and top management nowadays often involve multiple criteria or objectives. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), founded by [46], is one widely used decision-making procedure for establishing priorities in multi-criteria decision problems [47], [48] due to its simplicity, ease of use, and great flexibility. The AHP consists of an eigenvalue approach to pairwise comparisons, which provides a numeric scale for the measurement of quantitative as well as qualitative performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decisions in start-ups and top management nowadays often involve multiple criteria or objectives. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), founded by [46], is one widely used decision-making procedure for establishing priorities in multi-criteria decision problems [47], [48] due to its simplicity, ease of use, and great flexibility. The AHP consists of an eigenvalue approach to pairwise comparisons, which provides a numeric scale for the measurement of quantitative as well as qualitative performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The index proposed by Bascaron [13] presents normalization of the parameters seeking to balance the influence of each one on the final value of the index. In addition, it is a very flexible index in addition of other parameters [9,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Advances In Environmental Monitoring and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…morbilidad). Para reducir la subjetividad en la asignación de los pesos, Sutadian et al (2017) recomiendan adoptar un proceso de jerarquía analítica ideado por Satty en 1980. Este método sin embargo recopila los juicios basándose en pensamientos, experiencias y conocimiento de los participantes, por tanto igual a los demás métodos existe subjetividad, por otro lado se puede aplicar con diferentes escalas de puntuación por lo que se pueden obtener pesos distintos.…”
Section: Discusión Finalunclassified