Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs

Abstract

Evaluation of training program is made to establish the achievement of program objectives and to provide recommendations for program improvements. In this article, use of the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) evaluation model in training programs is discussed. It is an evaluation research, with a descriptive quantitative approach involving 16 training program participants as research subjects. The data collection techniques were based on questionnaires as the main instrument, with interview guides and observation guidelines as supporting instruments. The data analysis was made by comparing the scores obtained with the ideal score and multiplying by 100%; the results of these calculations were then grouped into a number of criteria that had been established. The results of the study indicate that the context dimension consisting of training objectives, training needs assessment, and state agency program organizers obtained a PE (Percentage of Effectiveness) score of 75.04%, placing it in the "fair" criterion. In the input dimension, consisting of participant description , instructor condition, infrastructure, training curriculum and instructional media, the PE score was 79.44% again in the "fair" criterion. In the process dimension, comprising lecture method, discussion method, demonstration method, question and answer method, practice method, field visiting method and evaluation of learning outcomes, the PE score obtained was 78.75%, which was also in the "fair" criterion. Finally, in the product dimension of knowledge aspect, attitude aspect and skill aspect, the PE score was 82.29%, in the “good" criterion. Based on the results of the dimension evaluation, the total PE score obtained was 78.88%, or overall in the "fair" criterion. It can be concluded that in general the execution of this training program was successful, so it is recommended that similar programs be conducted again, with some improvements.

CIPP vs kirkpatrick in the evaluation of physics teacher competency development programs: literature study

“…Unlike the Kirkpatric model, it does not provide evaluator flexibility to evaluate training programs and the evaluation process can be done only when the program is implemented. In the implementation of the CIPP model is also very suitable to be used to evaluate programs that have been designed and planned well, because it pays attention to aspects of context, inputs, processes and products of the program [9,13,19,21,26].…”

Evaluation of Basic Safety Training with CIPP

“…This examination means to get a solid image of the Basic Safety Training execution through the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) approach (Umam & Saripah, 2018). The advancement research likewise reports in detail the conduct of preparing members, preparing exercises, and investigation to decide the appropriate strategy and improvement.…”

Development of Video Tutorials on Making Paper-Based Literature Review to Improve Student Literacy Ability in the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic

“…This model consists of evaluating context, input, process, and product [11]. Context evaluation is used to determine the extent to which program goals and objectives have been achieved [12]. Input evaluation is used to assist in making decisions about how facilities, human resources, and budgets will be determined and shaped to achieve educational goals [13].…”