2016
DOI: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using two web-based addiction Stroops to measure the attentional bias in adults with Internet Gaming Disorder

Abstract: Background and aimsPeople with substance abuse and pathological gamblers show an attentional bias. In a laboratory setting, we found an attentional bias using an addiction Stroop in adults with Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD). We aimed at investigating this effect using two web-based experiments.MethodsStudy 1: Gamers with IGD, casual gamers, and non-gamers (N = 81, 28.1 ± 7.8 years) completed a web-based addiction Stroop with a fully randomized word order. They saw computer-related and neutral words in four co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were reported by Jeromin et al [ 19 ], who found attentional biases toward computer-related stimuli in excessive Internet gamers by using a modified Stroop version: excessive gamers showed longer reaction times to computer-related words compared to neutral words. However, Jeronim and colleagues were not able to replicate these findings in another study [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similar findings were reported by Jeromin et al [ 19 ], who found attentional biases toward computer-related stimuli in excessive Internet gamers by using a modified Stroop version: excessive gamers showed longer reaction times to computer-related words compared to neutral words. However, Jeronim and colleagues were not able to replicate these findings in another study [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Construct validity has been confirmed by the strong positive correlation with the Online Cognition Scale ( r = 0.70, p < .001) and the amount of time spent online ( r = 0.33, p < .001) (Meerkerk et al, 2009). We defined probable IGD as a total IGDS ≥ 5, and probable PIU as a total CIUS score of ≥ 29 (Jeromin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the studies, except for Jeromin et al [20] provided evidence for the presence of attentional biases. The only study that have examined the evidence for cognitive bias modification also reported it to be effective in reducing attentional biases [17].…”
Section: Evidence For the Cognitive Bias And Bias Modificationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Meanwhile in van Holst et al [19]'s study, game-related and movie-related words, which were matched in terms of length and phonetics, were used. In two other studies, computer-related and office-related words were used instead [14,20]. There were variations in the task paradigm across the studies.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Cognitive Bias Assessment Tools Utilizedmentioning
confidence: 99%