2022
DOI: 10.1002/jee.20447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using workplace thriving theory to investigate first‐year engineering students' abilities to thrive during the transition to online learning due to COVID‐19

Abstract: Background: During the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, universities rapidly pivoted to online formats and were often unable to adhere to the best practices of online learning highlighted in prior literature. It is well documented that a variety of barriers impeded "normal" educational practices.Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the perceptions of first-year engineering students enrolled in an introductory engineering design course during the rapid transition to online working enviro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, in engineering contexts, Ge and Berger (2018) proposed a framework for undergraduate engineering thriving, arguing that the field of engineering education has identified interventions that mitigate student failure but not those that foster the cognitive and personal outcomes required for student thriving (2018). In addition, Krishnakumar et al (2022) recently explored undergraduate hybrid education by applying Spreitzer's Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work (Spreitzer et al, 2005). This model has begun to be operationalized even more recently for doctoral engineering students, illuminating dynamic processes in which graduate students agentically work to thrive (Zerbe et al, 2023).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in engineering contexts, Ge and Berger (2018) proposed a framework for undergraduate engineering thriving, arguing that the field of engineering education has identified interventions that mitigate student failure but not those that foster the cognitive and personal outcomes required for student thriving (2018). In addition, Krishnakumar et al (2022) recently explored undergraduate hybrid education by applying Spreitzer's Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work (Spreitzer et al, 2005). This model has begun to be operationalized even more recently for doctoral engineering students, illuminating dynamic processes in which graduate students agentically work to thrive (Zerbe et al, 2023).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-structured interviews similarly use a pre-determined interview protocol based on the phenomenon in question, however, it serves more as a guide rather than a strict script, resulting in deviations from the questions during the interview. Semi-structured interviewing has become the dominant structure of interviewing in EER, with numerous studies using the practice to gain deep understanding of participants' experiences across a variety of topics ranging from engineering student learning [27,28], thriving [29,30], and social capital [31] to faculty instructional approaches [32,33] and engineering culture [34].…”
Section: Interview Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While first-year engineering students faced many challenges with online learning, not all experiences were negative. Some students were able to adapt and sometime even thrive in online settings [14]. Through innovative teaching methods, online learning may actually be beneficial to students in some specific areas like spatial reasoning [34].…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%