1993
DOI: 10.2307/2419537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Ontogenetic and Conventional Characters in Determining Phylogenetic Relationships of Saururaceae and Piperaceae (Piperales)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In America the genus occurs from Bermuda and the southeastern United States (Boufford 1982) to southern Chile, central and littoral Argentina and southern Uruguay (IBODA 2015). Several morphological synapomorphies support this genus, such as a single carpel, unitegmic ovule, 16-nucleate embryo sac, two monothecal bisporangiated stamens, and small non-aperturate pollen (Tucker et al 1993, Jaramillo et al 2004, Wanke et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In America the genus occurs from Bermuda and the southeastern United States (Boufford 1982) to southern Chile, central and littoral Argentina and southern Uruguay (IBODA 2015). Several morphological synapomorphies support this genus, such as a single carpel, unitegmic ovule, 16-nucleate embryo sac, two monothecal bisporangiated stamens, and small non-aperturate pollen (Tucker et al 1993, Jaramillo et al 2004, Wanke et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Stamens in Piperaceae are stereotypically initiated with a pair in the lateral plane, followed by a primordium in the anterior position, and another single stamen in the posterior position (Tucker 1982). In looser inflorescences, such as in P. amalago, another pair of primordia is originated in the lateral plane of the flower (Tucker 1982); in tighter inflorescences like in P. umbellatum, only the first pair of stamens originates (Tucker et al 1993). However, this explanation does not seem to be universal.…”
Section: Flower Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic Justification. A morphological parsimony analysis using 24 morphological characters modified from matrices of Tucker et al (1993), Tucker and Douglas (1996), and Meng et al (2003) placed Saururus tuckerae in a single most parsimonious position within the family Saururaceae, as the sister group of a clade formed by the two extant species of Saururus (Smith and Stockey, 2007). The relationship of the fossil with extant Saururus, one of four genera in Saururaceae, was supported by the following synapomorphies: basally connate carpels, 1-2 ovules per carpel, and marginal placentation (Smith and Stockey, 2007).…”
Section: Fossil Taxon 10mentioning
confidence: 95%