2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of serum Campylobacter specific antibodies in determining prior Campylobacter infection in neurological disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study four asymptomatic C. jejuni-positive cases were encountered. [18] The commonest subtype of GBS in our study was AIDP, although patients with AMAN were considerably common. Among the C. jejuni-positive GBS cases 66% were of the axonal subtype (AMAN and AMSAN).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In our study four asymptomatic C. jejuni-positive cases were encountered. [18] The commonest subtype of GBS in our study was AIDP, although patients with AMAN were considerably common. Among the C. jejuni-positive GBS cases 66% were of the axonal subtype (AMAN and AMSAN).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni), which is one of the leading factors associated with the development of GBS, was significantly associated with the development of GBS in all seven studies that studied this association [33][34][35][36][37]. Pneumococcal vaccine, yellow fever and human papillomavirus (HPV) in girls were other vaccines reported in the studies; none were associated with the occurrence of GBS [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, most serological tests have a high false-negative rate and for those individuals that do seroconvert the antibody titer quickly decreases after a few months [ 47 , 48 ]. Studies on acute Guillain-Barré syndrome, a disease often triggered by Campylobacter infections have found up to 80% of cases display serological evidence of Campylobacter , but it is unclear whether the negative cases were triggered by Campylobacter or other infections [ 49 ], and false positives have been observed [ 50 ]. Regarding the New Zealand patient, this could be explained by a number of scenarios including: the Campylobacter was not the cause of any pathology and had not been presented to the immune system or triggered an immune response; the Campylobacter contributed to the diarrheal episodes but the patient was unable to form an immune response sufficient to remove the bacteria or be detected using the serological method described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%