1945
DOI: 10.1038/156234c0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of Carotene from Oils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1945
1945
1957
1957

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…THE determination of carotene in plant tissues, the two general methods of removal of noncarotenoids are phasic and chromatographic separations (4,30,34)• In view of the recognized variations in the extent of digestion and absorption of carotene and its interdependence on the presence of varying amounts of antioxidants (1,7,14,15,16,39,40), complete chromatographic analysis, involving the separation of various carotene isomers, is neither practical nor necessary for routine analytical purposes, particularly in the nutritional evaluation of foods, feeds, and fodders (89). The phase separation method, on the other hand, is not always quantitative (11,83,24,25); certain biologically inert degradation products are also taken up in the epiphasic layer (36,50).…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THE determination of carotene in plant tissues, the two general methods of removal of noncarotenoids are phasic and chromatographic separations (4,30,34)• In view of the recognized variations in the extent of digestion and absorption of carotene and its interdependence on the presence of varying amounts of antioxidants (1,7,14,15,16,39,40), complete chromatographic analysis, involving the separation of various carotene isomers, is neither practical nor necessary for routine analytical purposes, particularly in the nutritional evaluation of foods, feeds, and fodders (89). The phase separation method, on the other hand, is not always quantitative (11,83,24,25); certain biologically inert degradation products are also taken up in the epiphasic layer (36,50).…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%