2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2002.180501.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV‐induced skin changes due to regular use of commercial sunbeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(29 reference statements)
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions on percentage use are supported in a much larger cross-sectional study, published in the same year, of 4147 boys and 5932 girls aged 12-18 yr from all 50 USA states (30). A total of 9.5% had used a sunbed in the previous year, with much greater use by the girls (OR ¼ 7 95%; CI ¼ 5.7-8.7) and with older girls (15)(16)(17)(18) more likely to report use than younger girls (24.6% vs. 4.7%). A smaller study of 210 students, published in 2001 in Texas, reported that 18% had used a tanning bed in the previous 6 months (31).…”
Section: Use Of Tanning Devicessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conclusions on percentage use are supported in a much larger cross-sectional study, published in the same year, of 4147 boys and 5932 girls aged 12-18 yr from all 50 USA states (30). A total of 9.5% had used a sunbed in the previous year, with much greater use by the girls (OR ¼ 7 95%; CI ¼ 5.7-8.7) and with older girls (15)(16)(17)(18) more likely to report use than younger girls (24.6% vs. 4.7%). A smaller study of 210 students, published in 2001 in Texas, reported that 18% had used a tanning bed in the previous 6 months (31).…”
Section: Use Of Tanning Devicessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…There is evidence to suggest that tans induced by UVB and UVA are qualitatively different and that a UVA-induced tan provides almost no photoprotection (14). One study showed that tanning for at least 6 weeks with UVA sunbeds did not result in any changes in minimal erythema dose (MED), indicating that the tan was not photoprotective (15). Recent studies with SSR have shown that tanning in skin types II and IV is associated with an accumulation of epidermal DNA photodamage (16).…”
Section: Tanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruegemer et al. 9 found that doses of 1·13 or 1·46 J m −2 , twice weekly for 6 weeks, were insufficient to induce significant increases in pigmentation. Bech‐Thomsen et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many studies confirm the protective effect of continuous solar exposure during childhood and adolescence, particularly in individuals with phototype III-IV [33, 37], while excessive exposures, especially in people with fair skin and in the first 10 years of life, is associated with an increased risk of melanoma in later life [41, 48, 49]. Interestingly, some studies have indicated that artificially induced suntan, for example, before holidays/increased exposure to sunlight, has minimal to no protection against DNA damage [5052]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%