2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-022-03899-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and analysis of turbulence modeling in pipe elbow under secondary flow conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A test calculation was performed with the k-Epsilon turbulence model. However, due to the limited validation possibilities, the SST model was finally used, which should better describe the secondary flow in the penstock [21]. The calculation step is AutoTimescale-conservative with a factor of 0.25.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A test calculation was performed with the k-Epsilon turbulence model. However, due to the limited validation possibilities, the SST model was finally used, which should better describe the secondary flow in the penstock [21]. The calculation step is AutoTimescale-conservative with a factor of 0.25.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planned turbulence model is SST, and for the automatic wall function, all the first cells should be located in the log-law region near the wall [20] with y+ value between 30 and 200. The relationship between y+, the turbulence model and the wall function is discussed in detail Carloni et al [21] or Nicolle et al [22] A simplified mesh dependency test was performed on the computational grid size for 2 million and approximately 7.3 million elements (see details of mesh parts in Figure 3). The mesh size effect on the value of the hydraulics losses and the behaviour of the velocity field in the penstock was monitored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%