2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and attempts of revision of the MDS-recommended tests for the screening of Parkinson's disease dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While both scales were recommended as useful tools to identify cognitively impaired patients with PD according to the MDS criteria for PDD 4,58 and the MMSE has long been used as the primary method of defining PDD, MoCA has been suggested to be more sensitive than MMSE in characterising PDD cases. More specifically, MMSE may be less sensitive to more subtle cognitive dysfunctions in well-educated samples, [59][60][61][62] and does not encompass items assessing executive functioning-which represents one of the cognitive domains commonly affected in PD. [63][64][65] Furthermore, some of the items on the MMSE may not be directly comparable to that of MoCA (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both scales were recommended as useful tools to identify cognitively impaired patients with PD according to the MDS criteria for PDD 4,58 and the MMSE has long been used as the primary method of defining PDD, MoCA has been suggested to be more sensitive than MMSE in characterising PDD cases. More specifically, MMSE may be less sensitive to more subtle cognitive dysfunctions in well-educated samples, [59][60][61][62] and does not encompass items assessing executive functioning-which represents one of the cognitive domains commonly affected in PD. [63][64][65] Furthermore, some of the items on the MMSE may not be directly comparable to that of MoCA (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it has been said that the MDS criteria are not very sensitive, with 100% specificity but only 46.7% sensitivity . That finding has been observed on other occasions and by various investigators; Isella et al . demonstrated a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 65%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were examined by a physician experienced in movement disorders and a registered research nurse using the UPDRS III, the Hoehn and Yahr Scale, and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) among other scales . The study participants' cognitive function was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) items 1 to 3, and the 1‐minute phonetic verbal fluency test or letter fluency test …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] The study participants' cognitive function was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) items 1 to 3, and the 1-minute phonetic verbal fluency test or letter fluency test. [32][33][34] All individuals gave written informed consent. The study procedure was approved by the local ethics committee at Lund University Sweden and conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%